[lamps] Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-ietf-lamps-pkix-shake-11: (with COMMENT)

Adam Roach via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Wed, 26 June 2019 03:48 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Adam Roach via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-lamps-pkix-shake@ietf.org, Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>, lamps-chairs@ietf.org, housley@vigilsec.com, spasm@ietf.org
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
Message-ID: <156152088345.31201.14139946948942855775.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2019 20:48:03 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/QxTqfX38HSNssFV5Sp5DwZb1pRU>
Subject: [lamps] Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-ietf-lamps-pkix-shake-11: (with COMMENT)

Adam Roach has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-lamps-pkix-shake-11: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lamps-pkix-shake/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Thanks to the authors for a well-written and easy to read document. I have
only one minor comment.

This document updates RFC 3279. It would be helpful if the abstract indicated
this fact. (cf. https://www.ietf.org/standards/ids/checklist/ §3.1.D.1)

[lamps] Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-ietf-l… Adam Roach via Datatracker
Re: [lamps] Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-ie… Panos Kampanakis (pkampana)