[lamps] Zaheduzzaman Sarker's No Objection on draft-ietf-lamps-rfc7299-update-01: (with COMMENT)

Zaheduzzaman Sarker via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Wed, 06 October 2021 02:09 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietf.org
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BFF43A12AD; Tue, 5 Oct 2021 19:09:16 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Zaheduzzaman Sarker via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-lamps-rfc7299-update@ietf.org, lamps-chairs@ietf.org, spasm@ietf.org, tim.hollebeek@digicert.com, tim.hollebeek@digicert.com
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 7.38.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Zaheduzzaman Sarker <Zaheduzzaman.Sarker@ericsson.com>
Message-ID: <163348615627.21494.11566480361173091797@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 05 Oct 2021 19:09:16 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/SFlpuiIusq5DHTyMKzuxHaPtw3A>
Subject: [lamps] Zaheduzzaman Sarker's No Objection on draft-ietf-lamps-rfc7299-update-01: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime \(spasm\) work." <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Oct 2021 02:09:17 -0000

Zaheduzzaman Sarker has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-lamps-rfc7299-update-01: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/blog/handling-iesg-ballot-positions/
for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lamps-rfc7299-update/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Thanks for this document.

A very minor comment - I think the first sentence in the abstract can be
removed and the 2nd sentence can be strengthened to cover the arc definition it
is referring to.