[lamps] Re: Draft leafy greens feedback
Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Sun, 30 August 2026 14:57 UTC
Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: spasm@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: spasm@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48926131D4468 for <spasm@mail2.ietf.org>; Sun, 30 Aug 2026 07:57:10 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1788101830; bh=V/mIeiOvl25qJ7iXnpSd+h72qu62VV4Mrww5NmiLXak=; h=From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=VHbLS8eznqJT2yfNlf43+CueWDMVHKFwtjTAB9ztdu7JerQbwN6g9gNscOLqBnbkR LuTiE8vfVkN6+lP8/40s+z+Stj3i5YYG0uK/jyiIRFc8RjX1ua4k9yEv9bhp1MERVL GVNE/yeBlPeNmrRWuFFUQ4X6fPdElYZFcx1ukN4s=
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: mail2.ietf.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sandelman.ca
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YuxpoO77fsX2 for <spasm@mail2.ietf.org>; Sun, 30 Aug 2026 07:57:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.19]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BD8B8131D4459 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Sun, 30 Aug 2026 07:57:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7080C1800D; Sun, 30 Aug 2026 10:57:03 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (amavis, port 10024) with LMTP id oq4-SLYqbBJp; Sun, 30 Aug 2026 10:57:01 -0400 (EDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sandelman.ca; s=mail; t=1788101821; bh=1soaIsNE0NiJ+253BY3HQCDrASntsyYyXyKR1ZyUA5M=; h=From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=vWLfFmgQNK4w+b8EhqOCfu+MFxT7Dz/vISmQKE4YyP5SYAz1+dxUscTp8KE4qw4IL w4W6Mj4Npa0nNEgR84uLRGjI7P+R7r9rHwK93e4+sjY/K9Ec/kOszBk7EuQRddyWlL Fk2Y3Rbz55K+DhY6Bk3IWEJeo2eCr2NEQwxjLYCCY1I5qx9LwGlKEeoPDM37xVtGwW 4MdVu9uA3EXjUrxCrdB+GQSgdqbcZbBrS1J1ua9BNcRjpjQSTpf548fwcedwb1HQ0u Zme4qL8esl+IbOM8t7S6lsuAsMe2QB9QtKbW/Jn8aAUYH31LGhD4beYL00ttszqF3B TpARgaqiljJ+w==
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2::247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F3001800C; Sun, 30 Aug 2026 10:57:01 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from obiwan.sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [127.0.0.1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07BAD5C; Sun, 30 Aug 2026 10:57:01 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Mike Ounsworth <mike=40ounsworth.ca@dmarc.ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <krld6BZjZWdAlzq_YxGR8hIbrVrxu9fmNZYwTKfOJvoreVWLYzSF-Viuo9LN-BOPt4r4YVXgj8294IUr6dGECDfzJ33RhK5e1W6rwarf7QQ=@ounsworth.ca>
References: <aR6haSXuG4DWv1CHNnpxjXz8HDrSr3QTaTucL0UDij-cG6mIILulEuh8x_TXW8em7iuY5EYLZZkI1rAGCKtXYPnmumjzpGhq3zZ5h17eDlE=@ounsworth.ca> <AB899736-51AB-41DA-9797-FF35D171EA91@obtuse.com> <91D27DD3-027C-4450-99A1-34012DB9BF2B@redhoundsoftware.com> <CAF8qwaAhk1zkLRiB8c1GMsX2wGP6zD9eg_oYvA=T5XxjyixPOw@mail.gmail.com> <26798B65-AA85-4EB0-90B5-1FAF8F495C3A@redhoundsoftware.com> <SYDP300MB26667065BE164EC005937637C0EEA62@SYDP300MB266670.AUSP300.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <krld6BZjZWdAlzq_YxGR8hIbrVrxu9fmNZYwTKfOJvoreVWLYzSF-Viuo9LN-BOPt4r4YVXgj8294IUr6dGECDfzJ33RhK5e1W6rwarf7QQ=@ounsworth.ca>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.8+dev; Emacs 30.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0;<'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2026 10:57:01 -0400
Message-ID: <11046.1788101821@obiwan.sandelman.ca>
Message-ID-Hash: FCZFMF5YUBMHV5US2FC6C2KJU5ABPIKI
X-Message-ID-Hash: FCZFMF5YUBMHV5US2FC6C2KJU5ABPIKI
X-MailFrom: mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-spasm.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: Peter Gutmann <pgut001@cs.auckland.ac.nz>, Carl Wallace <carl@redhoundsoftware.com>, David Benjamin <davidben@chromium.org>, Bob Beck <beck@obtuse.com>, "spasm@ietf.org" <spasm@ietf.org>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [lamps] Re: Draft leafy greens feedback
List-Id: This is the mail list for the LAMPS Working Group <spasm.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/Tz7devHwmPBSSwZBwWPjHn4KsAw>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:spasm-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:spasm-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:spasm-leave@ietf.org>
Mike Ounsworth <mike=40ounsworth.ca@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> My vote is to publish a draft that acknowledges and closes the gap
> between 5280 + 9525 by just documenting the obvious RP behaviour of
> "Clearly you can't accept a cert for *.example.com; exclude:
> foo.example.com when trying to connect to foo.example.com. If we do it
> right, that RFC will be a no-op for CA implementations, a no-op for
> clients that already do that check in some kind of sensible way, and a
> wakeup call for clients that didn't realize there was a problem.
Fantastic.
Does this mean that positive (include subtrees) actually works widely enough
that we can (a) mark the extension as critical, (b) when CAs actually use it.
(I think a wise CA does not use exclusions)
--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
** My working hours and your working hours may be different. **
** Please do not feel obligated to reply outside your normal working hours **
- [lamps] Re: Draft leafy greens feedback Bob Beck
- [lamps] Re: Draft leafy greens feedback Carl Wallace
- [lamps] Re: Draft leafy greens feedback David Benjamin
- [lamps] Re: Draft leafy greens feedback Carl Wallace
- [lamps] Re: Draft leafy greens feedback Peter Gutmann
- [lamps] Re: Draft leafy greens feedback Mike Ounsworth
- [lamps] Re: Draft leafy greens feedback David Benjamin
- [lamps] Re: Draft leafy greens feedback Carl Wallace
- [lamps] Re: Draft leafy greens feedback Peter Gutmann
- [lamps] Re: Draft leafy greens feedback Michael Richardson
- [lamps] Re: Draft leafy greens feedback Corey Bonnell
- [lamps] Re: Draft leafy greens feedback Michael StJohns
- [lamps] Re: Draft leafy greens feedback Corey Bonnell
- [lamps] Re: Draft leafy greens feedback Michael StJohns
- [lamps] Re: Draft leafy greens feedback Carl Wallace
- [lamps] Re: Draft leafy greens feedback Bob Beck
- [lamps] Re: Draft leafy greens feedback Michael StJohns
- [lamps] Re: Draft leafy greens feedback David Benjamin
- [lamps] Re: Draft leafy greens feedback Bob Beck
- [lamps] Re: Draft leafy greens feedback Michael StJohns
- [lamps] Re: Draft leafy greens feedback Michael StJohns
- [lamps] Re: Draft leafy greens feedback Carl Wallace
- [lamps] Re: Draft leafy greens feedback Bob Beck
- [lamps] Re: Draft leafy greens feedback Salz, Rich
- [lamps] Re: Draft leafy greens feedback Bob Beck
- [lamps] Re: Draft leafy greens feedback Bob Beck
- [lamps] Re: Draft leafy greens feedback Carl Wallace
- [lamps] Re: Draft leafy greens feedback Bob Beck
- [lamps] Re: Draft leafy greens feedback Carl Wallace
- [lamps] Re: Draft leafy greens feedback Bob Beck
- [lamps] Re: Draft leafy greens feedback Carl Wallace
- [lamps] Re: Draft leafy greens feedback Salz, Rich