IETF Logo Mail Archive

[lamps] Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC10031 (9137)

Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Tue, 18 August 2026 17:18 UTC

Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: spasm@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: spasm@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0A8E12BD197C for <spasm@mail2.ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Aug 2026 10:18:15 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1787073495; bh=bo/h0eQvMyrdKJ8luW37qmprXQ6eShcXlEJiGTRRKp8=; h=Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:References:To; b=FUjNXRSjtzXtjyCzxush6pu9tqwxFiDFwtW+ewqvu+CeC9qCrBEvUb/QHiBtvWv02 c/7pWp3FYptCu70q7eBSUP21Aq0HB1rZATZLkIadm3iAkOtgHaO/Hj+LGrspVOTAMd J03ZVRQbU9uvgZoXcGiNb+ragIQO69gCUwQifpys=
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.799
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.799 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: mail2.ietf.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=vigilsec.com
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NEar-FxC5oSx for <spasm@mail2.ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Aug 2026 10:18:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail3.g24.pair.com (mail3.g24.pair.com [66.39.134.11]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1820712BD1957 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Aug 2026 10:18:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail3.g24.pair.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail3.g24.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECF8E1605C9; Tue, 18 Aug 2026 13:18:14 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (pool-96-255-71-95.washdc.fios.verizon.net [96.255.71.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail3.g24.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B154A124C85; Tue, 18 Aug 2026 13:18:14 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3864.600.51.1.1\))
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
In-Reply-To: <178698600492.18.16159888879891230849@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2026 13:18:04 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <97ACA959-F26F-47B7-B249-6AFCFFEFA843@vigilsec.com>
References: <178698600492.18.16159888879891230849@rfc-editor.org>
To: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3864.600.51.1.1)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=vigilsec.com; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; s=pair-202402141609; bh=nomFPSqJ6GeRmn96AYn6i34NXaMOvdgF0ty8ungWt2s=; b=teX927kHnCZrwGwk9uCjXeOXdU9xIHe+u1APJOpPKMUICnc+CmLc+7DVCRo3bLEmBySpPJFPBs0FA9URIeX4qNA3T2qApeO325uCS1CD/pvxUpOGlQ1h6yr/8sCMeSGms23LZ9N12FChQnvMr6o/d4vXO/xK2OWO9jqUMT51dI/VzJ6/hgdiIXG/Sg4rNVJbNkLIKWkgVDsfRpX5zczK6hSHs5wulmg9GhVLQcQmZle8350BcOecxhHad2BBkRK7O3E3JRdW20WnCTnjEsfmwPvGFVd0xc11yEKGSs0ZlkdvTNP+KQqlc1calIT7BXshiCOmYOr45SfNcGgc6A0/bQ==
X-Scanned-By: mailmunge 3.11 on 66.39.134.11
Message-ID-Hash: P52TDQIVTWRE4KL2KZ2LRZTZAP2IPEE6
X-Message-ID-Hash: P52TDQIVTWRE4KL2KZ2LRZTZAP2IPEE6
X-MailFrom: housley@vigilsec.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-spasm.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: tim.hollebeek@digicert.com, tomofumi.okubo@digicert.com, debcooley1@gmail.com, corey.bonnell@turbolightsolutions.com, msj@nthpermutation.com, stndrds-inacio@andrew.cmu.edu, joe@akayla.com, spasm@ietf.org, paitken@ciena.com
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [lamps] Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC10031 (9137)
List-Id: This is the mail list for the LAMPS Working Group <spasm.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/VYMsRPw4boH57awPeHw0K5Rq59E>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:spasm-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:spasm-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:spasm-leave@ietf.org>

RFC Editor:

Sadly, this is correct.  Please approve it.

Russ

> On Aug 17, 2026, at 1:00 PM, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org wrote:
> 
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC10031,
> "Media Access Control (MAC) Addresses in X.509 Certificates"
> 
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> https://errata.rfc-editor.org/eid9137/
> 
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Technical
> Reported by: Paul Aitken <paitken@ciena.com>
> 
> Section 3.2 says:
> 
> Original Text
> -------------
> For example, a constraint that specifies that the acceptable names must all be within an
> Organizationally Unique Identifier (OUI) of '00-00-5e' for an EUI-48 address would have
> a value part of '00005E000000'H, a mask part of 'FFFFFFFF000000'H, and would be
> encoded as OCTET STRING '00005E000000FFFFFF000000'H.
> 
> Corrected Text
> --------------
> For example, a constraint that specifies that the acceptable names must all be within an
> Organizationally Unique Identifier (OUI) of '00-00-5e' for an EUI-48 address would have
> a value part of '00005E000000'H, a mask part of 'FFFFFF000000'H, and would be
> encoded as OCTET STRING '00005E000000FFFFFF000000'H.
> 
> Notes
> -----
> The mask contains one too many octets (seven rather than six). There are too many FF's.
> 
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". Please
> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party  
> will log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.
> 
> --------------------------------------
> RFC10031 (draft-ietf-lamps-macaddress-on)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : Media Access Control (MAC) Addresses in X.509 Certificates
> Publication Date    : August 2026
> Author(s)           : R. Housley, C. Bonnell, J. Mandel, T. Okubo, M. StJohns
> Category            : Proposed Standard
> Source              : lamps (sec)
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Spasm mailing list -- spasm@ietf.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to spasm-leave@ietf.org

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status