Re: [lamps] Lars Eggert's No Objection on draft-ietf-lamps-crmf-update-algs-05: (with COMMENT)

[Russ Housley <[e-mail]>]

Lars:

> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> "Copyright Notice", paragraph 1, comment:
> 
> Shouldn't this document use the pre5378Trust200902 boilerplate, since it quotes
> from RFC4211? Or have the authors of RFC4211 given copyright to the Trust?

I was thinking about the NEW text when I chose the boilerplate, but the author of RFC 4211 is not able to give the needed consent, so it it probably safest to changes the boilerplate.

> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> All comments below are very minor change suggestions that you may choose to
> incorporate in some way (or ignore), as you see fit. There is no need to let me
> know what you did with these suggestions.
> 
> Section 1, paragraph 3, nit:
> -    *  HMAC-SHA1 [HMAC][SHS] is not boken yet, but there are much
> +    *  HMAC-SHA1 [HMAC][SHS] is not broken yet, but there are much
> +                                     +

Yes, Francesca pointed out this typo.  It has been corrected in my edit buffer.

> The following URLs in the document failed to return content:
> * http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-lamps-cms-aes-gmac-alg-02.txt <http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-lamps-cms-aes-gmac-alg-02.txt>

I newer version is available.  See:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lamps-cms-aes-gmac-alg/ <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lamps-cms-aes-gmac-alg/>

Russ