Re: [lamps] Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-ietf-lamps-samples-07: (with COMMENT)
Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net> Wed, 02 February 2022 22:26 UTC
Return-Path: <dkg@fifthhorseman.net>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDC8D3A233B; Wed, 2 Feb 2022 14:26:59 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=neutral reason="invalid (unsupported algorithm ed25519-sha256)" header.d=fifthhorseman.net header.b=TMaaoOWW; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fifthhorseman.net header.b=rbmRXFH9
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cTsv552esg34; Wed, 2 Feb 2022 14:26:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from che.mayfirst.org (che.mayfirst.org [IPv6:2001:470:1:116::7]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D50F83A2326; Wed, 2 Feb 2022 14:26:54 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=fifthhorseman.net; i=@fifthhorseman.net; q=dns/txt; s=2019; t=1643840809; h=from : to : cc : subject : in-reply-to : references : date : message-id : mime-version : content-type : from; bh=ezepk04Rm2+hUT4j/ZojWdVzM0eh/yy3ejmJQUyhhc8=; b=TMaaoOWWARARIId8MhhQU3Rt1gt8BlGsMh5SLqHZqWPHTZrzu24+KGCFszbNfQ+gU5g/8 oxUexVgYu60/xyuDA==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=fifthhorseman.net; i=@fifthhorseman.net; q=dns/txt; s=2019rsa; t=1643840809; h=from : to : cc : subject : in-reply-to : references : date : message-id : mime-version : content-type : from; bh=ezepk04Rm2+hUT4j/ZojWdVzM0eh/yy3ejmJQUyhhc8=; b=rbmRXFH9NwBEUREob3Ey3wFz1WzHedH4L7L5A/a9aDd3XSNIhIBFGI9gRT5mnjF0rkONP qgYLCShj4Rd69xLWCVlbUWMdTUlw5nMtxHxErr/D44nXWWjTznyUyHB7HvfdEp4a7AwFk0+ /ZhOzqooXIE5z02wtnPJA3hJLmJbfngf067OTU2HMLIAjEUhqEd4u2B0yp/TZHOzl0JsOZ1 npKsH5gHfzs7mNfePfla/oh+GzlMEA6BbdcIv1GmggOT5+FYZx18BH8G/m2x7GpA9Yw9+JB hgSIgk3qe7p0tHLodXi62cblRJSsNaPFP43wmwq29E1S5y6TPWLNoGZb2vSg==
Received: from fifthhorseman.net (lair.fifthhorseman.net [108.58.6.98]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by che.mayfirst.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 653B7F9AA; Wed, 2 Feb 2022 17:26:49 -0500 (EST)
Received: by fifthhorseman.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 48F51203BB; Wed, 2 Feb 2022 17:04:41 -0500 (EST)
From: Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net>
To: Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-lamps-samples@ietf.org, lamps-chairs@ietf.org, spasm@ietf.org, housley@vigilsec.com, tim.hollebeek@digicert.com, tim.hollebeek@digicert.com
In-Reply-To: <164142739988.6644.6125018090424718461@ietfa.amsl.com>
References: <164142739988.6644.6125018090424718461@ietfa.amsl.com>
Autocrypt: addr=dkg@fifthhorseman.net; prefer-encrypt=mutual; keydata= mDMEX+i03xYJKwYBBAHaRw8BAQdACA4xvL/xI5dHedcnkfViyq84doe8zFRid9jW7CC9XBiI0QQf FgoAgwWCX+i03wWJBZ+mAAMLCQcJEOCS6zpcoQ26RxQAAAAAAB4AIHNhbHRAbm90YXRpb25zLnNl cXVvaWEtcGdwLm9yZ/tr8E9NA10HvcAVlSxnox6z62KXCInWjZaiBIlgX6O5AxUKCAKbAQIeARYh BMKfigwB81402BaqXOCS6zpcoQ26AADZHQD/Zx9nc3N2kj13AUsKMr/7zekBtgfSIGB3hRCU74Su G44A/34Yp6IAkndewLxb1WdRSokycnaCVyrk0nb4imeAYyoPtBc8ZGtnQGZpZnRoaG9yc2VtYW4u bmV0PojRBBMWCgCDBYJf6LTfBYkFn6YAAwsJBwkQ4JLrOlyhDbpHFAAAAAAAHgAgc2FsdEBub3Rh dGlvbnMuc2VxdW9pYS1wZ3Aub3JnL0Gwxvypz2tu1IPG+yu1zPjkiZwpscsitwrVvzN3bbADFQoI ApsBAh4BFiEEwp+KDAHzXjTYFqpc4JLrOlyhDboAAPkXAP0Z29z7jW+YzLzPTQML4EQLMbkHOfU4 +s+ki81Czt0WqgD/SJ8RyrqDCtEP8+E4ZSR01ysKqh+MUAsTaJlzZjehiQ24MwRf6LTfFgkrBgEE AdpHDwEBB0DkKHOW2kmqfAK461+acQ49gc2Z6VoXMChRqobGP0ubb4kBiAQYFgoBOgWCX+i03wWJ BZ+mAAkQ4JLrOlyhDbpHFAAAAAAAHgAgc2FsdEBub3RhdGlvbnMuc2VxdW9pYS1wZ3Aub3Jnfvo+ nHoxDwaLaJD8XZuXiaqBNZtIGXIypF1udBBRoc0CmwICHgG+oAQZFgoAbwWCX+i03wkQPp1xc3He VlxHFAAAAAAAHgAgc2FsdEBub3RhdGlvbnMuc2VxdW9pYS1wZ3Aub3JnaheiqE7Pfi3Atb3GGTw+ jFcBGOaobgzEJrhEuFpXREEWIQQttUkcnfDcj0MoY88+nXFzcd5WXAAAvrsBAIJ5sBg8Udocv25N stN/zWOiYpnjjvOjVMLH4fV3pWE1AP9T6hzHz7hRnAA8d01vqoxOlQ3O6cb/kFYAjqx3oMXSBhYh BMKfigwB81402BaqXOCS6zpcoQ26AADX7gD/b83VObe14xrNP8xcltRrBZF5OE1rQSPkMNy+eWpk eCwA/1hxiS8ZxL5/elNjXiWuHXEvUGnRoVj745Vl48sZPVYMuDgEX+i03xIKKwYBBAGXVQEFAQEH QIGex1WZbH6xhUBve5mblScGYU+Y8QJOomXH+rr5tMsMAwEICYjJBBgWCgB7BYJf6LTfBYkFn6YA CRDgkus6XKENukcUAAAAAAAeACBzYWx0QG5vdGF0aW9ucy5zZXF1b2lhLXBncC5vcmcEAx9vTD3b J0SXkhvcRcCr6uIDJwic3KFKxkH1m4QW0QKbDAIeARYhBMKfigwB81402BaqXOCS6zpcoQ26AAAX mwD8CWmukxwskU82RZLMk5fm1wCgMB5z8dA50KLw3rgsCykBAKg1w/Y7XpBS3SlXEegIg1K1e6dR fRxL7Z37WZXoH8AH
Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2022 17:04:40 -0500
Message-ID: <87czk5lybr.fsf@fifthhorseman.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/WTojlPuOtwE7HoReH09NVLt1Kfw>
Subject: Re: [lamps] Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-ietf-lamps-samples-07: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime \(spasm\) work." <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2022 22:27:01 -0000
On Wed 2022-01-05 16:03:19 -0800, Benjamin Kaduk via Datatracker wrote:
> Should we say that the private keys are represented as the RFC 5958/PKCS#8
> structure, and that the RFC 8479 validation parameters attribute is
> included? At least, I think that's what it looks like...
good idea. i've added the two of those as normative references and
pointed to them in the text.
> Section 13.1
>
> It's not really clear to me that RFC 5322 needs to be classified as
> normative.
>
> Section 13.2
>
> RFC 7468 seems like it ought to be classified as normative, since it
> specifies the formats we use.
I've also swapped these two references between normative and
informative.
Thanks for the review,
--dkg
- [lamps] Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-ie… Benjamin Kaduk via Datatracker
- Re: [lamps] Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draf… Daniel Kahn Gillmor