Re: [lamps] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lamps-cms-hash-sig-06.txt
Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Wed, 27 February 2019 17:26 UTC
Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 229E01310E9 for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Feb 2019 09:26:30 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 79lwFJpLU0Ml for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Feb 2019 09:26:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.smeinc.net (mail.smeinc.net [209.135.209.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EF7671310FB for <spasm@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 Feb 2019 09:26:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 248F7300AB7 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 Feb 2019 12:08:09 -0500 (EST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail.smeinc.net
Received: from mail.smeinc.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.smeinc.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id ty1oYExuSyTk for <spasm@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 Feb 2019 12:08:07 -0500 (EST)
Received: from [172.31.98.183] (wsip-70-163-25-197.dc.dc.cox.net [70.163.25.197]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 442D63005D6; Wed, 27 Feb 2019 12:08:07 -0500 (EST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.2 \(3445.102.3\))
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
In-Reply-To: <01fa01d4ce3b$4c716840$e55438c0$@augustcellars.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2019 12:26:23 -0500
Cc: SPASM <spasm@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <782D8ACC-6B57-4067-BC14-9D11A7B02269@vigilsec.com>
References: <155120649715.695.14410208917743275760@ietfa.amsl.com> <9B90A5E8-00BC-43FE-ACC1-E7DBB184ED8C@vigilsec.com> <01fa01d4ce3b$4c716840$e55438c0$@augustcellars.com>
To: Jim Schaad <ietf@augustcellars.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.102.3)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/Wj73X7locnfIgyGI4rMPfEbBlYE>
Subject: Re: [lamps] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lamps-cms-hash-sig-06.txt
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime \(spasm\) work." <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2019 17:26:35 -0000
Jim: You are correct. I missed this when I made the last update. I will make the change now in my edit buffer. I'll post it along with any other changes that result from IETF Last Call. Russ > On Feb 26, 2019, at 8:25 PM, Jim Schaad <ietf@augustcellars.com> wrote: > > I have a small change to request. I am happy if you deal with it at a later > date as long as it does not get lost. > > > In the ASN.1 module, the SIGNATURE-ALGORITHM definition should have an empty > or absent HASHES field. There are no hash functions which are to be applied > prior to given the input to the signing function. This would match what I > did for EdDSA. > > Jim > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Spasm <spasm-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Russ Housley >> Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2019 10:44 AM >> To: SPASM <spasm@ietf.org> >> Subject: Re: [lamps] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lamps-cms-hash-sig-06.txt >> >> This removes the extraneous paragraph that was pointed out by Daniel. >> >> I believe that all comments have been resolved, and the document is now >> ready to go to the IESG. >> >> Russ >> >> >>> On Feb 26, 2019, at 1:41 PM, internet-drafts@ietf.org wrote: >>> >>> >>> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts >> directories. >>> This draft is a work item of the Limited Additional Mechanisms for PKIX > and >> SMIME WG of the IETF. >>> >>> Title : Use of the HSS/LMS Hash-based Signature > Algorithm in the >> Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS) >>> Author : Russ Housley >>> Filename : draft-ietf-lamps-cms-hash-sig-06.txt >>> Pages : 14 >>> Date : 2019-02-26 >>> >>> Abstract: >>> This document specifies the conventions for using the the HSS/LMS >>> hash-based signature algorithm with the Cryptographic Message Syntax >>> (CMS). In addition, the algorithm identifier and public key syntax >>> are provided. The HSS/LMS algorithm is one form of hash-based >>> digital signature; it is described in [HASHSIG]. >>> >>> >>> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: >>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lamps-cms-hash-sig/ >>> >>> There are also htmlized versions available at: >>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-lamps-cms-hash-sig-06 >>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-lamps-cms-hash-sig-06 >>> >>> A diff from the previous version is available at: >>> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-lamps-cms-hash-sig-06 >>> >>> >>> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of >>> submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at > tools.ietf.org. >>> >>> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: >>> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Spasm mailing list >> Spasm@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm > > _______________________________________________ > Spasm mailing list > Spasm@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm
- Re: [lamps] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lamps-cms-hash… Tim Hollebeek
- [lamps] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lamps-cms-hash-sig… internet-drafts
- Re: [lamps] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lamps-cms-hash… Russ Housley
- Re: [lamps] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lamps-cms-hash… Jim Schaad
- Re: [lamps] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lamps-cms-hash… Russ Housley
- Re: [lamps] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lamps-cms-hash… Daniel Van Geest
- Re: [lamps] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lamps-cms-hash… Jim Schaad
- Re: [lamps] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lamps-cms-hash… Daniel Van Geest
- Re: [lamps] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lamps-cms-hash… Jim Schaad
- Re: [lamps] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lamps-cms-hash… Daniel Van Geest
- Re: [lamps] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lamps-cms-hash… Russ Housley
- Re: [lamps] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lamps-cms-hash… Daniel Van Geest