IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [lamps] AD review of draft-ietf-lamps-rfc7030est-clarify-05

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Sun, 14 June 2020 18:12 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA8D13A03EA for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 14 Jun 2020 11:12:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id y7eNtn4cEdq4 for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 14 Jun 2020 11:12:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:3:216:3eff:fe7c:d1f3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 260E63A03ED for <spasm@ietf.org>; Sun, 14 Jun 2020 11:12:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12CBE389FF; Sun, 14 Jun 2020 14:10:03 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id I5yEWmDbXzQt; Sun, 14 Jun 2020 14:09:59 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2::247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 538F0389FE; Sun, 14 Jun 2020 14:09:59 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9638608; Sun, 14 Jun 2020 14:12:31 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
to: Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org>, LAMPS WG <spasm@ietf.org>
CC: max pritikin <pritikin@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <30816.1592158056@localhost>
References: <7cba97541fbd435b94192d23f966b363@cert.org> <30816.1592158056@localhost>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 26.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2020 14:12:31 -0400
Message-ID: <32379.1592158351@localhost>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/XjYDfBgs-3aO-voJliqd4LWiK2Y>
Subject: Re: [lamps] AD review of draft-ietf-lamps-rfc7030est-clarify-05
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime \(spasm\) work." <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2020 18:12:39 -0000

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> wrote:
    > okay, I'll change section 3.  Please see next email/diff.


A diff from the previous version is available at:
  https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-lamps-rfc7030est-clarify-06

I won't paste the diffs in here, since I think they look better there.

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email