Re: [Spasm] Call for adoption of draft-housley-rfc5280-i18n-update-02

Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com> Thu, 04 May 2017 16:53 UTC

Return-Path: <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B01521294EC for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 May 2017 09:53:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.698
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.698 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=isode.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ufFgPsQeUUYm for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 May 2017 09:53:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from statler.isode.com (Statler.isode.com [62.232.206.189]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91C851252BA for <spasm@ietf.org>; Thu, 4 May 2017 09:53:10 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1493916789; d=isode.com; s=june2016; i=@isode.com; bh=clgi/FZr9nGNkVPV71Nw8mhiSqx2iWkb/E3N3XjgbF0=; h=From:Sender:Reply-To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:To:Cc:MIME-Version: In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description; b=vVfpOc8df4An4KnMls9iXRh5cNAFGURuR3yRl0qzB9bTGaJCcfHHm3GKE6RrU2ITLcpu9c oYysLYpv2Fjp0QbSuJtO5uby7VWN4YPil/VM+01XrGEzDjrZeUyNSLTo2KWRbqdi0MVbqr Id1fzUhk6/OBRnnTla5r4X15HafF2fk=;
Received: from [172.20.1.215] (dhcp-215.isode.net [172.20.1.215]) by statler.isode.com (submission channel) via TCP with ESMTPSA id <WQtcdQAOgRYL@statler.isode.com>; Thu, 4 May 2017 17:53:09 +0100
To: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>, SPASM <spasm@ietf.org>
References: <149390730026.4760.3716367660582191455.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <957618A2-D716-46E2-A90B-2A37A983AF90@vigilsec.com> <DA521297-0015-4D82-9333-E180D74DDA44@vigilsec.com>
From: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
Message-ID: <6db83113-39de-d328-0d53-5d4670fd67c3@isode.com>
Date: Thu, 04 May 2017 17:52:10 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0
In-Reply-To: <DA521297-0015-4D82-9333-E180D74DDA44@vigilsec.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/_i1byks3Pif66moGH_l6fUgP9Wk>
Subject: Re: [Spasm] Call for adoption of draft-housley-rfc5280-i18n-update-02
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime \(spasm\) work." <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 May 2017 16:53:16 -0000

On 04/05/2017 15:48, Russ Housley wrote:

> The current approach in draft-ietf-lamps-eai-addresses depends on one of the updates, and the other updates are supportive.
>
> Is the working group willing to adopt this document?  If so, our AD will make any consensus calls related to it to avoid any conflict between author and WG Chair roles.
+1 for adoption.

A couple of nits on this version:

1.  Introduction

    An IDN in Unicode (native character) form contains at least one
    U-label [RFC5890].  With one exception, IDNs are carried in
    certificates in ACE-encoded form.  That is, all U-labels within an
    IDN are converted to A-labels.  Conversion of an U-label to an
    A-label is described in [RFC5981].

I don't think the reference is correct. I think you meant RFC5891.

7.5.1.  Local-part Contains Only ASCII Characters

    Where the host-part contains an IDN, conforming implementations MUST
    MUST convert all U-labels to A-labels.

Nit: MUST used twice