IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Spasm] Call for adoption of draft-housley-rfc5280-i18n-update-02

Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Tue, 09 May 2017 21:02 UTC

Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A04BC12EB49 for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 May 2017 14:02:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.5
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.5 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_05=-0.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vtdRLisVemqH for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 May 2017 14:02:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.smeinc.net (mail.smeinc.net [209.135.209.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 54A8A12EB46 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 May 2017 14:02:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C136A3004DB for <spasm@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 May 2017 17:02:21 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail.smeinc.net
Received: from mail.smeinc.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.smeinc.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id o-9nQOC3IqXE for <spasm@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 May 2017 17:02:21 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from a860b60074bd.home (pool-108-45-101-150.washdc.fios.verizon.net [108.45.101.150]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E04D93004B6 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 May 2017 17:02:20 -0400 (EDT)
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
Date: Tue, 09 May 2017 17:02:24 -0400
References: <149390730026.4760.3716367660582191455.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <957618A2-D716-46E2-A90B-2A37A983AF90@vigilsec.com> <DA521297-0015-4D82-9333-E180D74DDA44@vigilsec.com>
To: SPASM <spasm@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <DA521297-0015-4D82-9333-E180D74DDA44@vigilsec.com>
Message-Id: <595B25CE-CB6A-48B9-9E80-78D125ABCB12@vigilsec.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/rz1jc5FCF6hGdUVOyUYfdZUxl6k>
Subject: Re: [Spasm] Call for adoption of draft-housley-rfc5280-i18n-update-02
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime \(spasm\) work." <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2017 21:02:23 -0000

I have heard several people speak for adopting this document.  I have not heard anyone speak against adopting it.  I will post draft-ietf-lamps-rfc5280-i18n-update-00.

Russ


> On May 4, 2017, at 10:48 AM, Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> wrote:
> 
> The current approach in draft-ietf-lamps-eai-addresses depends on one of the updates, and the other updates are supportive.
> 
> Is the working group willing to adopt this document?  If so, our AD will make any consensus calls related to it to avoid any conflict between author and WG Chair roles.
> 
> Russ

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email