IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Spasm] Call for adoption of draft-housley-rfc5280-i18n-update-02

Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Thu, 04 May 2017 14:48 UTC

Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C37E1204DA for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 May 2017 07:48:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_40=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Qy5P9Ds_fwAJ for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 May 2017 07:48:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.smeinc.net (mail.smeinc.net [209.135.209.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B5EBA12441E for <spasm@ietf.org>; Thu, 4 May 2017 07:48:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5C8C3004FE for <spasm@ietf.org>; Thu, 4 May 2017 10:48:31 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail.smeinc.net
Received: from mail.smeinc.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.smeinc.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id wckglPQpJCmp for <spasm@ietf.org>; Thu, 4 May 2017 10:48:30 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from a860b60074bd.home (pool-108-45-101-150.washdc.fios.verizon.net [108.45.101.150]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CCC5D300265 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Thu, 4 May 2017 10:48:30 -0400 (EDT)
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
Date: Thu, 04 May 2017 10:48:30 -0400
References: <149390730026.4760.3716367660582191455.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <957618A2-D716-46E2-A90B-2A37A983AF90@vigilsec.com>
To: SPASM <spasm@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <957618A2-D716-46E2-A90B-2A37A983AF90@vigilsec.com>
Message-Id: <DA521297-0015-4D82-9333-E180D74DDA44@vigilsec.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/a96mYS2u2m47briry5jN6eiLMZ0>
Subject: [Spasm] Call for adoption of draft-housley-rfc5280-i18n-update-02
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime \(spasm\) work." <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 May 2017 14:48:33 -0000

The current approach in draft-ietf-lamps-eai-addresses depends on one of the updates, and the other updates are supportive.

Is the working group willing to adopt this document?  If so, our AD will make any consensus calls related to it to avoid any conflict between author and WG Chair roles.

Russ

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email