[lamps] RFC 9483 on Lightweight Certificate Management Protocol (CMP) Profile
rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Sun, 05 November 2023 15:45 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfcpa.amsl.com>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38B00C05E049; Sun, 5 Nov 2023 07:45:06 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.532
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.532 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, RDNS_NONE=0.793, SPF_HELO_SOFTFAIL=0.732, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hiWyHGeSDmlv; Sun, 5 Nov 2023 07:45:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (unknown [50.223.129.200]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1E0A3C00EA7E; Sun, 5 Nov 2023 07:43:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: by rfcpa.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 499) id EAE0D289D5; Sun, 5 Nov 2023 07:43:18 -0800 (PST)
To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Cc: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org, drafts-update-ref@iana.org, spasm@ietf.org
Content-type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20231105154318.EAE0D289D5@rfcpa.amsl.com>
Date: Sun, 05 Nov 2023 07:43:18 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/a9ttc_lrcLLFyAeZ11wSHHjg8nQ>
Subject: [lamps] RFC 9483 on Lightweight Certificate Management Protocol (CMP) Profile
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: This is the mail list for the LAMPS Working Group <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Nov 2023 15:45:06 -0000
A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.
RFC 9483
Title: Lightweight Certificate Management Protocol (CMP)
Profile
Author: H. Brockhaus,
D. von Oheimb,
S. Fries
Status: Standards Track
Stream: IETF
Date: November 2023
Mailbox: hendrik.brockhaus@siemens.com,
david.von.oheimb@siemens.com,
steffen.fries@siemens.com
Pages: 83
Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso: None
I-D Tag: draft-ietf-lamps-lightweight-cmp-profile-21.txt
URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9483
DOI: 10.17487/RFC9483
This document aims at simple, interoperable, and automated PKI
management operations covering typical use cases of industrial and
Internet of Things (IoT) scenarios. This is achieved by profiling
the Certificate Management Protocol (CMP), the related Certificate
Request Message Format (CRMF), and transfer based on HTTP or
Constrained Application Protocol (CoAP) in a succinct but
sufficiently detailed and self-contained way. To make secure
certificate management for simple scenarios and constrained devices
as lightweight as possible, only the most crucial types of operations
and options are specified as mandatory. More specialized or complex
use cases are supported with optional features.
This document is a product of the Limited Additional Mechanisms for PKIX and SMIME Working Group of the IETF.
This is now a Proposed Standard.
STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet Standards Track
protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions
for improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the Official
Internet Protocol Standards (https://www.rfc-editor.org/standards) for the
standardization state and status of this protocol. Distribution of this
memo is unlimited.
This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists.
To subscribe or unsubscribe, see
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist
For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search
For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk
Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the
author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless
specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for
unlimited distribution.
The RFC Editor Team
Association Management Solutions, LLC