IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Spasm] An OCSP response extension

Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Thu, 09 March 2017 19:19 UTC

Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FE56128824 for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 11:19:07 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SdrQ-hOiAAMx for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 11:19:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.smeinc.net (mail.smeinc.net [209.135.209.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BB56D129853 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 11:19:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E79F4300449 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 14:19:04 -0500 (EST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail.smeinc.net
Received: from mail.smeinc.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.smeinc.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id 6KIf9slfR7hd for <spasm@ietf.org>; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 14:19:04 -0500 (EST)
Received: from russhousleymbp.home (pool-108-45-101-150.washdc.fios.verizon.net [108.45.101.150]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 066D13002C4; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 14:19:03 -0500 (EST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.2 \(3259\))
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAMfhd9U4dH0Uw5=OCqhycYrx0u3hoUQPW_07fHUYyiL5O8E-hg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 09 Mar 2017 14:19:03 -0500
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <2CDB8533-CB33-484A-AAB2-FD8FD0CB8D74@vigilsec.com>
References: <b404a8551c8645b1aaa3675dc1d8da0f@usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com> <7B492EB7-CC0D-4706-85AC-8844F5BCF847@vigilsec.com> <244b0812054a41598425c6cdbf511392@usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com> <e64fa37d9d4049cea615d793ab10cc12@usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com> <CAMfhd9XngCH5zb2pLsj-niKuq=D3hvr3S22kU-8MGbM1xjyx3w@mail.gmail.com> <6d9976eb3fdd4bb2840a5d91ee66eec2@usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com> <CAMfhd9U4dH0Uw5=OCqhycYrx0u3hoUQPW_07fHUYyiL5O8E-hg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Rich Salz <rsalz@akamai.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3259)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/aw6W-mw4vqBpEzegUQ5DeCZmfU4>
Cc: SPASM <spasm@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Spasm] An OCSP response extension
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime \(spasm\) work." <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Mar 2017 19:19:07 -0000

>> I'd only use it for revoked status.
> 
> Ah, I didn't get that point and, with that understanding, have no objection.

If that is the intended us, I’d suggest:

id-pkix-ocsp-revoke-hint OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { id-pkix-ocsp TBD }
 
re-ocsp-revoke-hint EXTENSION { SYNTAX UTF8String
                                IDENTIFIED BY id-pkix-ocsp-revoke-hint }
 
Russ

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email