IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [lamps] MAC (or ICV) generation

Erik Andersen <era@x500.eu> Thu, 30 April 2020 15:38 UTC

Return-Path: <era@x500.eu>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1D943A0C8B for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 08:38:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.696
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.696 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=neutral reason="invalid (public key: not available)" header.d=x500.eu
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oBM9QLXK0Kem for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 08:38:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from outscan1.mf.dandomain.dk (outscan1.mf.dandomain.dk [212.237.249.58]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F288E3A0D9C for <spasm@ietf.org>; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 08:37:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by outscan1.mf.dandomain.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3082C40691C7; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 17:37:43 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from outscan1.mf.dandomain.dk ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (outscan1.mf.dandomain.dk [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BlCTFD3PyS9D; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 17:37:42 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mail-proxy.dandomain.dk (dilvs03.dandomain.net [194.150.112.64]) by outscan1.mf.dandomain.dk (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 06E144068C95; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 17:37:40 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=x500.eu; s=dandomain; t=1588261062; bh=b05TX16cIqYf1iin/6t3AfEEBqAol/QV1Rzig0m0ypg=; h=From:To:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Date:From; b=I7f+cMaVXtfuXPfU6x3BHxejjXrCY3iR4yfHtPlHmx20TpBQJ14KDOzXFyLHYAW/2 XnkcV29Cs6vuYn1R8Omjbr4r9BDYXN3KRc73+RC5T8WqL8tk78HO0xfy16Yf0gbuvd E5tOlTtcgVq4mLPzLhuNJqezKcZTrq2ev80HPEYe9gvj6vZQwzSfAjLMFd+RCyUDQy feSQQ68ibsDe+hHVPoyXIquX7/QhHyLGuLNsNn5a5oSV/F4P7Mqg+C8XlF5FNqbl98 xaA5ADD9aNqp7QKZ4jaiHy0OatIt3MdW6fK5zrMmKJ21AGafn9EiZOHEeDKV1OtRc8 ZiZC0uyDrzDpQ==
From: Erik Andersen <era@x500.eu>
To: "'Salz, Rich'" <rsalz@akamai.com>, 'LAMPS' <spasm@ietf.org>
References: <001301d61ebe$ba9b2e80$2fd18b80$@x500.eu> <5CB31AAA-B35E-4F28-B0B0-FE0EEFC6EBFE@vigilsec.com> <002301d61efd$339f5ed0$9ade1c70$@x500.eu> <E68D170C-AF30-4A36-A82F-0C23015E2474@akamai.com>
In-Reply-To: <E68D170C-AF30-4A36-A82F-0C23015E2474@akamai.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2020 17:37:40 +0200
Message-ID: <003401d61f05$49a27750$dce765f0$@x500.eu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0035_01D61F16.0D2C7FD0"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Thread-Index: AQIeXTH8vmX/yjfa7b81JlFsI9TmBQIuclCiAicLjrABV/Pu36fT5Cig
Content-Language: en-gb
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/c6C4TltMLMyWe5GwTJUcizr4vhY>
Subject: Re: [lamps] MAC (or ICV) generation
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime \(spasm\) work." <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2020 15:38:53 -0000

Thanks Rich, just what I need.

 

Erik

 

From: Salz, Rich <rsalz@akamai.com> 
Sent: 30 April 2020 16:46
To: Erik Andersen <era@x500.eu>; LAMPS <spasm@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [lamps] MAC (or ICV) generation

 

https://crypto.stackexchange.com/questions/202/should-we-mac-then-encrypt-or-encrypt-then-mac

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status