Re: [lamps] New Version Notification for draft-luck-lamps-pep-header-protection-00.txt (fwd)
Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Sat, 09 March 2019 23:17 UTC
Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84E99129570 for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 9 Mar 2019 15:17:34 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rpl7vRY3aszG for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 9 Mar 2019 15:17:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.smeinc.net (mail.smeinc.net [209.135.209.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8CFD4127968 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Sat, 9 Mar 2019 15:17:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63894300A42 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Sat, 9 Mar 2019 17:59:14 -0500 (EST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail.smeinc.net
Received: from mail.smeinc.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.smeinc.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id pxhZqPVtqSBp for <spasm@ietf.org>; Sat, 9 Mar 2019 17:59:13 -0500 (EST)
Received: from [10.196.217.15] (3-197.icannmeeting.org [199.91.197.3]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B44AF300471; Sat, 9 Mar 2019 17:59:12 -0500 (EST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.2 \(3445.102.3\))
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1903092012060.25367@softronics.hoeneisen.ch>
Date: Sat, 09 Mar 2019 18:17:27 -0500
Cc: IETF LAMPS WG <spasm@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <A82BF291-A696-4BCD-A033-E44C93CEEA7E@vigilsec.com>
References: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1903092012060.25367@softronics.hoeneisen.ch>
To: Bernie Hoeneisen <bernie@ietf.hoeneisen.ch>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.102.3)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/dYNhlxnHhDY8qDN_TEykdBn3wZY>
Subject: Re: [lamps] New Version Notification for draft-luck-lamps-pep-header-protection-00.txt (fwd)
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime \(spasm\) work." <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Mar 2019 23:17:35 -0000
Bernie: > > We have just submitted a new I-D on Header Protection. > > It contains the Use Cases and a list of requirements to base the discussion on. Furthermore it shares implemenation experience with Header Protection that pEp (pretty Easy privacy) has gained over the past years. > > @LAMPS chairs: Are we ready to have an initial requirements discussion on Header protection in LAMPS@Prague? The IESG has not approved the re-charter yet. I can add this to the agenda, but it needs to come after the topics that are in the charter. It should come before topics that have not been requested to be added to the charter already. Russ >
- [lamps] New Version Notification for draft-luck-l… Bernie Hoeneisen
- Re: [lamps] New Version Notification for draft-lu… Russ Housley