Re: [lamps] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lamps-rfc3709bis-09.txt

Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Wed, 07 December 2022 22:50 UTC

Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFA76C152713 for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Dec 2022 14:50:21 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GFGcal6_ANAU for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Dec 2022 14:50:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail3.g24.pair.com (mail3.g24.pair.com [66.39.134.11]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0EC73C1522CF for <spasm@ietf.org>; Wed, 7 Dec 2022 14:50:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail3.g24.pair.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail3.g24.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9A4288A2F for <spasm@ietf.org>; Wed, 7 Dec 2022 17:50:16 -0500 (EST)
Received: from [10.0.1.2] (pfs.iad.rg.net [198.180.150.6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail3.g24.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DB9FE5C478 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Wed, 7 Dec 2022 17:50:16 -0500 (EST)
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.21\))
Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2022 17:50:16 -0500
References: <167045327233.29724.6084313379457140310@ietfa.amsl.com>
To: LAMPS <spasm@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <167045327233.29724.6084313379457140310@ietfa.amsl.com>
Message-Id: <98B16C53-3F93-4DFA-96CB-43BB08D5AF90@vigilsec.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.21)
X-Scanned-By: mailmunge 3.10 on 66.39.134.11
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/eCVcZ-x04O3x0NRCkuGydgr7kYo>
Subject: Re: [lamps] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lamps-rfc3709bis-09.txt
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime \(spasm\) work." <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2022 22:50:21 -0000

This update addresses the comments during IESG Evaluation.  The discussion was copied to the mail list, so no one shold be surprised to see these changes.  Also, the IANA considerations were improved.

Russ


> On Dec 7, 2022, at 5:47 PM, internet-drafts@ietf.org wrote:
> 
> 
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
> This draft is a work item of the Limited Additional Mechanisms for PKIX and SMIME WG of the IETF.
> 
>        Title           : Internet X.509 Public Key Infrastructure: Logotypes in X.509 Certificates
>        Authors         : Stefan Santesson
>                          Russ Housley
>                          Trevor Freeman
>                          Leonard Rosenthol
>  Filename        : draft-ietf-lamps-rfc3709bis-09.txt
>  Pages           : 47
>  Date            : 2022-12-07
> 
> Abstract:
>   This document specifies a certificate extension for including
>   logotypes in public key certificates and attribute certificates.
>   This document obsoletes RFC 3709 and RFC 6170.
> 
> 
> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lamps-rfc3709bis/
> 
> There is also an HTML version available at:
> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-lamps-rfc3709bis-09.html
> 
> A diff from the previous version is available at:
> https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-ietf-lamps-rfc3709bis-09
> 
> 
> Internet-Drafts are also available by rsync at rsync.ietf.org::internet-drafts