[lamps] Re: Call for adoption of draft-birgelee-lamps-caa-security

Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Fri, 02 May 2025 18:37 UTC

Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: spasm@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: spasm@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 256562439B04 for <spasm@mail2.ietf.org>; Fri, 2 May 2025 11:37:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.799
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.799 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: mail2.ietf.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=vigilsec.com
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id c9U12CR0tgxk for <spasm@mail2.ietf.org>; Fri, 2 May 2025 11:37:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail3.g24.pair.com (mail3.g24.pair.com [66.39.134.11]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 903102439AFF for <spasm@ietf.org>; Fri, 2 May 2025 11:37:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail3.g24.pair.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail3.g24.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A2351A0B95 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Fri, 2 May 2025 14:37:11 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (unknown [96.241.2.243]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail3.g24.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4D53C1A2B82 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Fri, 2 May 2025 14:37:11 -0400 (EDT)
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3826.500.181.1.5\))
Date: Fri, 02 May 2025 14:37:01 -0400
References: <CAF8qwaA-beSAxmzYsZT_a60M6_vGtbgWKajxiqHJascb944hJg@mail.gmail.com> <55BDED79-A0F3-419B-B657-E25560636A35@vigilsec.com>
To: LAMPS <spasm@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <55BDED79-A0F3-419B-B657-E25560636A35@vigilsec.com>
Message-Id: <FC63033E-26EB-4FAA-9929-39DF335D54DF@vigilsec.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3826.500.181.1.5)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=vigilsec.com; h=from:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:date:references:to:in-reply-to:message-id; s=pair-202402141609; bh=KbrjhW3x9SVNVC0YUbr22miW7xwf8Jv9BJPqcXUd7J4=; b=dt9KaV1fCj5fQ/RX07bFBgUxcNgybABfRhrSJLBXfV/woVxqLvh4XAKgMGbNSx2UqkKRKJHsw9uQIMaU8oKwuik6tdnGsO4AF/Bs7Ry6dPCMgwej5D66ZP6qCZ0O0byRmdf7nUuC5m+iOVtTXe/gbCwyqYdO4k4HrhPhCLVGBYq9X/9tn/egrrKcxq9zcsTihKf8vNCHoSyRQRknKzjIivxBJAuxuyaDAi29NwKZuccsVRPzFkNRzjVV1yOuwkxamPjCncVPB6Tgxvd/tDDkVOFN/xIGilJRutqr3B3qQnw/5Lj373Xo3NPYWPmOIrkm+mT22fLDbJJutLkzllJScg==
X-Scanned-By: mailmunge 3.09 on 66.39.134.11
Message-ID-Hash: UO6G56HKISYOKMHC6E2OI6KALFPGPEXV
X-Message-ID-Hash: UO6G56HKISYOKMHC6E2OI6KALFPGPEXV
X-MailFrom: housley@vigilsec.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-spasm.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [lamps] Re: Call for adoption of draft-birgelee-lamps-caa-security
List-Id: This is the mail list for the LAMPS Working Group <spasm.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/kUpsR1KcbVY7ceUY5ZElB37tQs8>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:spasm-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:spasm-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:spasm-leave@ietf.org>

There was not loud support for this adoption, but no one spoke against adoption.

Authors, please post  draft-ietf-lamps-caa-security-00.

For the LAMPS WG Chairs,
Russ


> On Apr 18, 2025, at 3:32 PM, Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> wrote:
> 
> The authors have asked the LAMPS WG to adopt this I-D.  It offers improved security of domains that choose to use Cryptographically-Constrained Domain validation.
> 
> The Internet-Draft is here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-birgelee-lamps-caa-security/
> 
> Please voice your support or concerns for the LAMPS WG adoption of this document by 2 May 2025.
> 
> For the LAMPS WG Chair,
> Russ
>