Re: [lamps] Conflict review for draft-mcgrew-hash-sigs-13
Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> Fri, 30 November 2018 21:00 UTC
Return-Path: <ekr@rtfm.com>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 265DF130FF9 for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 30 Nov 2018 13:00:54 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.357
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.357 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-1.459, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=rtfm-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id g740ZfkvK6T5 for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 30 Nov 2018 13:00:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lj1-x231.google.com (mail-lj1-x231.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 84449130E8F for <spasm@ietf.org>; Fri, 30 Nov 2018 13:00:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lj1-x231.google.com with SMTP id n18-v6so6177580lji.7 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Fri, 30 Nov 2018 13:00:52 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rtfm-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=SMb2DpQqRCmwH1LA49xsKC1rJxxEb3yLxBMjWH0/WGc=; b=cu3PmUxxypV7ZZ9sUntc5bGI1472GGLqnaKWcerqTXOpvgiGsomtw3Y1KZeZQ4O5gu yw/Kn1oypss5vqrlVVVq4gSQZNdK0lecBheo7VFyd/0l2cV/ryfuSeoJBDFqR5huMGJK HFqPU/O2ffB6PawWl3dlqhlZNOFeovAR/GBnZmY33Imvqh0EWFGnw034X4iaTS3LxBd1 Oz8dDN5lcdEBKnA82kVaY5MC2p1ztUreWKX9a1vkM+gJOwjJf7E/BQ8UYrN14MkxvVcx UGH1HAOAUXEuHLUPYAnHeVaeENRJMVwbhTLiQhqT2UW+Zz3rkiYN5wJiOsaQ9DjtwpJp xA0g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=SMb2DpQqRCmwH1LA49xsKC1rJxxEb3yLxBMjWH0/WGc=; b=Vs1lqPrv9M7MojXGlYZAy2l30GBYjwdj0vUTKis3HrVmjQgDWqWHAO3eefkDeLgjsW MBBhfE7rKgPwSKCXfISZR1hn+n7YaKiO08TTXwfqq385smkD3hRJN6fO3cJcLiqGkwm6 GwOCEsGk23LrMCnH9npjJft3ZNsIh1M1Hb3i+N94fZe8nAXeHVjzYen6CYRAJCyqyNqa IcJKyWBiUDAXGIJvsnHux1X77kjVlBumNYvxik5lSQGmK4OWPyt20vo00OldBXnY3qri dAKGMgmrsW2jT2mGIXSj2A3WoWyYcWPCx/55QafE2DGAzqcEdCbHtSZ7k/xqwHiPh7Gh l/UA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AA+aEWbr0x/onuycRXUU6NNhqvxR28la1c2xNs17R6Xn5K63MIlZSAp/ SrNVEpZ1RH6j0kjGXZwEEJZurfMN2aSck2LNBlNWNA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AFSGD/VvuzMLR6dqT7Dp9NHvkoWqGe3uc82ap3DKumXupnd5Wmf9GXDxFhCi3lYvdMSmtsOfVU5RB+s1bOl7T3dgHBE=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:6503:: with SMTP id z3-v6mr4655862ljb.153.1543611650711; Fri, 30 Nov 2018 13:00:50 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CABcZeBNFcNT+xep63TabBB5Km5=uvYAc1NR1VaNdUK+7crVVug@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABcZeBNFcNT+xep63TabBB5Km5=uvYAc1NR1VaNdUK+7crVVug@mail.gmail.com>
From: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2018 13:00:13 -0800
Message-ID: <CABcZeBNBmsvoh9-mvu5yCnFFd9XMf1KFTZd264OXqtB2c_+15A@mail.gmail.com>
To: saag@ietf.org, SPASM <spasm@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000001cbb58057be81857"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/mC5oVVYJHcR8REw6HBjnjRnf8jw>
Subject: Re: [lamps] Conflict review for draft-mcgrew-hash-sigs-13
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime \(spasm\) work." <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2018 21:00:54 -0000
And now with the right address On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 12:56 PM Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> wrote: > The IESG has been asked to do a conflict review for this document. > > My perspective is that this is valuable and there is no conflict with IETF > work, other than that it supports our work. So I believe the correct > response is: > > The IESG has concluded that this work is related to IETF work done in LAMPS [and others people suggest?] but this relationship does not prevent publishing. > > If you have comments on this or think this is wrong, please let me know by next Wednesday, > > -Ekr > >
- Re: [lamps] Conflict review for draft-mcgrew-hash… Eric Rescorla