[lamps] Re: AD Review of draft-ietf-lamps-cms-euf-cma-signeddata-02

[Deb Cooley <[e-mail]>]

That was my understanding as well.

Deb

On Tue, Jul 14, 2026 at 2:18 PM Russ Housley <[e-mail]> wrote:

> Roman:
>
>
> To help balance the document load in coordination with the responsible AD
> for LAMPS (Deb Cooley), I will take over as responsible AD for
> draft-ietf-lamps-cms-euf-cma-signeddata.
>
>
> Thanks for helping.
>
> Thanks for this document.  My AD Review feedback is as follows:
>
> ** WG Chairs and responsible AD for LAMPS: Your insight is needed.  This
> document appears to be outside of the charter for LAMPS.  It might fall
> into the remit of “This includes maintenance of protocols such as …
> Certificate Management over Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS) (CMC)”.
> However, all work in LAMPS appears to be restricted to Standards Track
> (“The LAMPS WG is now tackling these topics which will be published as
> Standards Track”) which precludes publication of a BCP, the classification
> of this document.
>
>
> While BCP document are not on the standards-track, thery require the same
> level of consensus, which is the way I took that statement.
>
> Russ
> _______________________________________________
> Spasm mailing list -- [e-mail]
> To unsubscribe send an email to [e-mail]
>