[lamps] Fwd: Re: [IANA #1276131] expert review for draft-ietf-lamps-caa-issuemail (pkix-parameters)

[[e-mail]]

This is a forward of transaction #16561212 of ticket #1276131

--- Begin Message ---

>From [e-mail]  sat jul 15 21: 40:41 2023
In-Reply-To: <[e-mail]>
Message-ID: <CAMm+Lwj6-KO=[e-mail]>
X-Proofpoint-SPF-Record: v=spf1 redirect=_spf.google.com
CC: [e-mail]
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Orig-Guid: qfVba7aEsgGJqOcYTdsOFo2B4WT1clo3
X-GM-Message-State: ABy/qLbAdZ0BDVllD0uiLMN/nDHnhuvf6CM5jJr+oWwvf0IUFq7L88AW
 DC26xMQ7Xd9O+67PXl08clMsEPLadAIiO3/jcYNN+jzQ
X-CLX-Response: 1TFkXGR8RCkx6FxsaHhEKWUQXbkVPQmdZHkxZehoRClhYF2dQbF5ERhgBb0h
 SEQp4ThdrGn9BHURaRRhbWhEKeUwXaVluSExEU3N6Gm0RCkNIFwcYEQpDWRcHGBwcEQpDSRcaBB
 oaGhEKWU0XZ2ZyEQpZSRcacRoQGncGHx5xGR0QGxp3BgcbEwYaEQpZXhdoY3kRCklGF0NJS0REd
 VpYRU5fSV5DRUQHXEcRCklHF3hPTREKQ04XW0x8SEsdS29ZTW1gW2VJc35OWWVsRRhoHn1+G0lG
 RRkRClhcFx8EGgQZGB4FGxoEGxoaBBsZHgQZHhAbHhofGhEKXlkXSBxmSBoRCk1cFxsdExEKTFo
 XbUJNTREKTU4XaBEKTEYXb2xraREKQk8XehNEW1J8XWMFREkRCkNaFxgaEwQSHwQbHBoEHxoRCk
 JeFxsRCkRJFxsRCkJFF2dlSWZbbFNsRWZzEQpCThdrGn9BHURaRRhbWhEKQkwXZ1BsXkRGGAFvS
 FIRCkJsF2wYfHJcH28TYlthEQpCQBdjbgVfGXhNBX97chEKQlgXYBl8RmNaeHhZGH4RCk1eFxsR
 ClpYFxkRCnlDF2hIQWMcGBtvTmR6EQpwZxdoYkYFYnpcSWBzaBAHHRoRCnBoF2kYZ39EenBOeGx
 HEAcdGhEKcGgXbR9gQk9PeHpYZG0QBx0aEQpwaBdmGR1icnNicmBQUxAHHRoRCnBoF2lPXWMbcl
 l6QnJlEAcdGhEKcGgXbnxjfmNlRFNQY2gQBx0aEQpwaBdkRh1IbRljXUxkUxAHHRoRCnBoF24ab
 wVhZQFnBXAbEAcdGhEKcGgXbFkac3piXn5eZU8QBx0aEQpwZxduU1xGXAFhf2ZnZBAZGhEKcH0X
 aEh8HhxTbUFbTXMQHhIRCnB9F2VPWlMfTWRSYHpNEB4SEQpwfxdoU2wFRlwZeh5jHBAbGhwRCnB
 fF20Tc20TZhMebEQaEBsdGBEKcH8XZ11DBRJQT2VFcxwQHB8RCnBfF2lwb3wacmMaHxoFEB4SEQ
 pwbBdnZ1BrW3tTSx5BWxAZGhEKbX4XGxEKWE0XSxEg
From: "Phillip Hallam-Baker" <[e-mail]>
X-Proofpoint-Guid: qfVba7aEsgGJqOcYTdsOFo2B4WT1clo3
X-Google-SMTP-Source: APBJJlFCnXi7EcQncigf2UWcH4qxNzlZsDMYHrghTy5JQnSCCXVLQidIdJNbZlYkAQBFa/VNlK1jr6+pNN7c7cTRRMc=
Subject: Re: [IANA #1276131] expert review for draft-ietf-lamps-caa-issuemail
 (pkix-parameters)
X-CLX-Shades: MLX
Authentication-Results: ppa1.lax.icann.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=[e-mail];
 dmarc=none
References: <[e-mail]>
 <[e-mail]>
 <[e-mail]>
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.254,Aquarius:18.0.957,Hydra:6.0.591,FMLib:17.11.176.26
 definitions=2023-07-15_10,2023-07-13_01,2023-05-22_02
X-Original-To: [e-mail]
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=inbound_notspam policy=inbound score=0
 suspectscore=0 clxscore=35 malwarescore=0 priorityscore=104
 lowpriorityscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxscore=0 mlxlogscore=796 spamscore=0
 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 phishscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx
 scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2306200000 definitions=main-2307150205
X-Google-Dkim-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1689457219; x=1692049219; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references
 :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id
 :reply-to; bh=ufQ6FyM17s/Eg7M2gZSm/Btg/9dZd5FpKMOHyHuvxo4=;
 b=IGZB5jRNYJqhS9ZRDdrkZ1I47t8b7HjosuFCgDpHBkZ1TAoWuUbpAlnJ+dxhE0Sfgr
 YTwLaHS4QXNIwRZgYWWQpjqiTix20yWFigMj+3qZ1pW4UHp384Tmy4OQk8FLoFJTidpu
 OJMjlIawKbBZN1+kvABwoVHkWaWdgKUj4WU/BfEVLeNag7d7TCJlpDMn/gIQNuhPUdFO
 7HWg09wrAik41TFYf+A1IPDtJcdIILnjbXitLISld2UIHuKdoK0KD98LQ9IPOMDs7sa6
 XCqyMf9f8Z5KFCkSM+EYX//iD4NI4/CPcyknQ/687BHxPnyI8NQ828UVUSamJcvkX7IR
 m40Q==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000069b84a06008d696d"
X-RT-Incoming-Encryption: Not encrypted
RT-Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Content-Length: 0

This is a multi-part message in MIME format...

--00000000000069b84a06008d696d
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-RT-Original-Encoding: utf-8
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Length: 1141

The document looks OK, registration approved.

One nit that did come to mind is that the document says 'email' and does
not specify the email protocol. While it is currently reasonably obvious
this is going to be SMTP, that may not be the case in the future. If the
instant messaging people ever come up with a federated approach they are
likely to end up using [e-mail] type addresses. If they are
offering end-to-end secure messages of email length, well what would we
need SMTP for?


On Fri, Jul 7, 2023 at 7:42=E2=80=AFPM David Dong via RT <
[e-mail]> wrote:

> Dear Phillip (cc: lamps WG),
>
> As the designated expert for the Certification Authority Restriction
> Properties registry, can you review the proposed registration in
> draft-ietf-lamps-caa-issuemail for us? Please see
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lamps-caa-issuemail/
>
> The due date is July 21st.
>
> If this is OK, when the IESG approves the document for publication, we'll
> make the registration at:
>
> https://www.iana.org/assignments/pkix-parameters/
>
> With thanks,
>
> David Dong
> IANA Services Specialist
>

--00000000000069b84a06008d696d
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8"
X-RT-Original-Encoding: utf-8
Content-Length: 1960

<div dir=3D"ltr"><div class=3D"gmail_default" style=3D"font-size:small">The=
 document looks OK, registration approved.</div><div class=3D"gmail_default=
" style=3D"font-size:small"><br></div><div class=3D"gmail_default" style=3D=
"font-size:small">One nit that did come to mind is that the document says &=
#39;email&#39; and does not specify the email protocol. While it is current=
ly reasonably obvious this is going to be SMTP, that may not be the case in=
 the future. If the instant messaging people ever come up with a federated =
approach they are likely to end up using <a href=3D"mailto:[e-mail]=
m">[e-mail]</a> type addresses. If they are offering end-to-end se=
cure messages of email length, well what would we need SMTP for?</div><div =
class=3D"gmail_default" style=3D"font-size:small"><br></div></div><br><div =
class=3D"gmail_quote"><div dir=3D"ltr" class=3D"gmail_attr">On Fri, Jul 7, =
2023 at 7:42=E2=80=AFPM David Dong via RT &lt;<a href=3D"mailto:drafts-expe=
[e-mail]">[e-mail]</a>&gt; w=
rote:<br></div><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0px 0px 0p=
x 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">Dear Phill=
ip (cc: lamps WG),<br>
<br>
As the designated expert for the Certification Authority Restriction Proper=
ties registry, can you review the proposed registration in draft-ietf-lamps=
-caa-issuemail for us? Please see<br>
<br>
<a href=3D"https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lamps-caa-issuemail/=
" rel=3D"noreferrer" target=3D"_blank">https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/dra=
ft-ietf-lamps-caa-issuemail/</a><br>
<br>
The due date is July 21st.<br>
<br>
If this is OK, when the IESG approves the document for publication, we&#39;=
ll make the registration at:<br>
<br>
<a href=3D"https://www.iana.org/assignments/pkix-parameters/" rel=3D"norefe=
rrer" target=3D"_blank">https://www.iana.org/assignments/pkix-parameters/</=
a><br>
<br>
With thanks,<br>
<br>
David Dong<br>
IANA Services Specialist<br>
</blockquote></div>

--00000000000069b84a06008d696d--

--- End Message ---