[lamps] Erik Kline's No Objection on draft-ietf-lamps-macaddress-on-06: (with COMMENT)

[Erik Kline via Datatracker <[e-mail]>]

Erik Kline has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-lamps-macaddress-on-06: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ 
for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lamps-macaddress-on/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

# Internet AD comments for draft-ietf-lamps-macaddress-on-06
CC @ekline

* comment syntax:
  - https://github.com/mnot/ietf-comments/blob/main/format.md

* "Handling Ballot Positions":
  - https://ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/

## Comments

### S3.4.1

* I saw there's an earlier requirement on CAs not to sign malformed
  NCE instances (S3.2) but might there be an addition check here, perhaps:

  "4.1 Perform a bitwise AND operation with the value bit pattern from
   Step 3 and mask bit pattern from Step 4. If the resulting value does
   not equal the value bit pattern the NCE is invalid."

  or something? (or perhaps I've misunderstood)

## Nits

### S3

* "GeneraName.otherName" ->
  "GeneralName.otherName" I expect

* "comprising of" -> "comprising", I believe