IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Spasm] DRAFT Agenda for LAMPS WG session in Berlin

Sean Leonard <dev+ietf@seantek.com> Wed, 29 June 2016 18:08 UTC

Return-Path: <dev+ietf@seantek.com>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEC6712D1D8 for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Jun 2016 11:08:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.601
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.601 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yNt86ItQgPv6 for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Jun 2016 11:08:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mxout-08.mxes.net (mxout-08.mxes.net [216.86.168.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 582CE12B01C for <spasm@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 Jun 2016 11:08:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.123.7] (unknown [75.83.2.34]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5AADF509B6 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 Jun 2016 14:08:22 -0400 (EDT)
To: spasm@ietf.org
References: <1903B2F2-879C-47AC-A2E6-A5D19A8449EE@vigilsec.com> <CAAFsWK0oHx3gyFqU7H+iyZ2pfCj_ag6qgb_An0O0H0kYnMsevQ@mail.gmail.com> <29cdb03f-9d35-5467-a9d0-1d73c7b474ee@isode.com>
From: Sean Leonard <dev+ietf@seantek.com>
Message-ID: <2264b4d0-f1a9-3273-9d91-4df6852cd3f0@seantek.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2016 11:08:05 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.1.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <29cdb03f-9d35-5467-a9d0-1d73c7b474ee@isode.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/zAaHuYXLXC8Bg87aO90NA_OVcsE>
Subject: Re: [Spasm] DRAFT Agenda for LAMPS WG session in Berlin
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime \(spasm\) work." <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2016 18:08:26 -0000

On 6/29/2016 10:37 AM, Alexey Melnikov wrote:
>
> On 29/06/2016 18:35, Wei Chuang wrote:
>
>> I think this agenda looks good.
>>
>> Another thing to consider are the CMS algorithm updates which as I 
>> recall was going to Curdle.  It would be very useful to hear how the 
>> progress for these drafts:
>>         draft-housley-cms-eddsa-signatures
>>         draft-housley-cms-ecdh-new-curves
>>         draft-housley-cms-chacha20-poly1305
> +1 (if we have time)

+1 as well.

Sean

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email