[lamps] Deb Cooley's No Objection on draft-ietf-lamps-rfc5019bis-08: (with COMMENT)

[Deb Cooley via Datatracker <[e-mail]>]

Deb Cooley has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-lamps-rfc5019bis-08: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ 
for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lamps-rfc5019bis/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I have only one comment:

Section 3.2.2, Appendix A:  The two terms 'byName' and 'byKey' are used without
being defined (note: this is true in RFC 5019 too).  There are numerous 'Name'
fields in the ASN.1, but no 'Key' fields.  My suggestion is to define these
terms by pointing to the appropriate ASN.1 field.

[note:  finally, I get to ballot on a document I understand.  LOL]