Re: [spfbis] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7208 (7542)

Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it> Sun, 11 June 2023 10:22 UTC

Return-Path: <vesely@tana.it>
X-Original-To: spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1732C14CE4C for <spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 11 Jun 2023 03:22:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=neutral reason="invalid (unsupported algorithm ed25519-sha256)" header.d=tana.it header.b="fH6ZgOi8"; dkim=pass (1152-bit key) header.d=tana.it header.b="A7JfIwbb"
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4Aaxnwoi71WJ for <spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 11 Jun 2023 03:22:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wmail.tana.it (wmail.tana.it [94.198.96.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9C3A0C15106D for <spfbis@ietf.org>; Sun, 11 Jun 2023 03:22:35 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tana.it; s=epsilon; t=1686478952; bh=QHaENihlvNXtDL4tRWIzZxnOhWM6+qBAbt0cVYiTbzs=; h=Author:Date:Subject:To:References:From:In-Reply-To; b=fH6ZgOi8Q0BTe3HozViy4xIrJGIhQb8urwAuI8tTr1y6Rj+Yj1FRy6NbW0zC35Kwg GK+DpKzwy1SYX2EZzr8CA==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tana.it; s=delta; t=1686478952; bh=QHaENihlvNXtDL4tRWIzZxnOhWM6+qBAbt0cVYiTbzs=; h=Date:Subject:To:References:From:In-Reply-To; b=A7JfIwbbwgTbU57KytXoqceuzsGq3KhMFiFTYbsg+3fzoCYA1xkBIR3v226hV5n+H 9bYzVCZsWdk2p2H45qI5m7D7JDZ3/RNS+mtusT+8PoWYHHqsyLVYZUVLTYHRIRsPV7 xOT3ZpPRDEPu9XB5eovi+3+fQJ2PfKyB3IZuoNawvXMB5QmcHy2+bsVVWjFCm
Original-Subject: Re: [spfbis] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7208 (7542)
Author: Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it>
Received: from [172.25.197.111] (pcale.tana [172.25.197.111]) (AUTH: CRAM-MD5 uXDGrn@SYT0/k, TLS: TLS1.3, 128bits, ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) by wmail.tana.it with ESMTPSA id 00000000005DC0D8.000000006485A068.00005868; Sun, 11 Jun 2023 12:22:32 +0200
Message-ID: <92b3a557-f9b5-93d3-a195-be976bd509d1@tana.it>
Date: Sun, 11 Jun 2023 12:22:32 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.11.0
Content-Language: en-US, it-IT
To: spfbis@ietf.org
References: <20230609223608.016D87FDF5@rfcpa.amsl.com>
Authentication-Results: tana.it; auth=pass (details omitted)
From: Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it>
In-Reply-To: <20230609223608.016D87FDF5@rfcpa.amsl.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spfbis/5eDyFSk5TFLAasOD7GyHrkcIz2w>
Subject: Re: [spfbis] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7208 (7542)
X-BeenThere: spfbis@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: SPFbis discussion list <spfbis.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spfbis>, <mailto:spfbis-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spfbis/>
List-Post: <mailto:spfbis@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spfbis-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spfbis>, <mailto:spfbis-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jun 2023 10:22:45 -0000

RFC 7208 was published on April 26, not 1st.

Best
Ale

On Sat 10/Jun/2023 00:36:07 +0200 RFC Errata System wrote:
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC7208,
> "Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1".
> 
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7542
> 
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Editorial
> Reported by: McCoy L Stevens Xvii <mccoy@adam4adam.ca>
> 
> Section: GLOBAL
> 
> Original Text
> -------------
> Peter Piper
> 
> Corrected Text
> --------------
> McCoy L Stevens
> 
> Notes
> -----
> Update for the world
> 
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party
> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.
> 
> --------------------------------------
> RFC7208 (draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-21)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1
> Publication Date    : April 2014
> Author(s)           : S. Kitterman
> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
> Source              : SPF Update
> Area                : Applications
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG
> 
> _______________________________________________
> spfbis mailing list
> spfbis@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spfbis