IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [spfbis] I-D Action: draft-ietf-spfbis-experiment-07.txt

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <msk@cloudmark.com> Tue, 24 April 2012 19:07 UTC

Return-Path: <msk@cloudmark.com>
X-Original-To: spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C20321E80BE for <spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 12:07:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.548
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.548 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.051, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9y-QIeCyQOqg for <spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 12:07:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.cloudmark.com (cmgw1.cloudmark.com [208.83.136.25]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E66CD21E80BD for <spfbis@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 12:07:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ht1-outbound.cloudmark.com ([72.5.239.25]) by mail.cloudmark.com with bizsmtp id 1v7d1j0010ZaKgw01v7dEQ; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 12:07:37 -0700
X-CMAE-Match: 0
X-CMAE-Score: 0.00
X-CMAE-Analysis: v=2.0 cv=fNu7LOme c=1 sm=1 a=LdFkGDrDWH2mcjCZERnC4w==:17 a=LvckAehuu68A:10 a=F2Is80RiDhcA:10 a=zutiEJmiVI4A:10 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=xqWC_Br6kY4A:10 a=48vgC7mUAAAA:8 a=5kdXndSPKeKxFkndk6MA:9 a=daMNDKKn_6pBJZaFF40A:7 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=lZB815dzVvQA:10 a=LdFkGDrDWH2mcjCZERnC4w==:117
Received: from EXCH-MBX901.corp.cloudmark.com ([fe80::addf:849a:f71c:4a82]) by exch-htcas901.corp.cloudmark.com ([fe80::2524:76b6:a865:539c%10]) with mapi id 14.01.0355.002; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 12:07:16 -0700
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <msk@cloudmark.com>
To: "spfbis@ietf.org" <spfbis@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [spfbis] I-D Action: draft-ietf-spfbis-experiment-07.txt
Thread-Index: AQHNIk0dgLmo6FBHCUmG5fZCEUHYzpaqVauQ
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 19:07:15 +0000
Message-ID: <9452079D1A51524AA5749AD23E003928101338@exch-mbx901.corp.cloudmark.com>
References: <20120424190442.3697.25094.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <20120424190442.3697.25094.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [172.20.2.121]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cloudmark.com; s=default; t=1335294457; bh=hMefotW8RyhzxViW7rW9Pi0UGjDW5wA7rx0M7t2yJbY=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:References:In-Reply-To: Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; b=DV2Oq5wCYbC94qWg/ov9Fd7rRuYKbskag0c6O+udxsv2r01QV5of+6LICLBlL733L pGW2N9BgUsMuX+w8flM5CjUGtyiN2OWtz2ZZiQ3d4QqQkB0HJlbpldJ+96KDF+p6fO fG7BFyVgjNuRkau10jcClr9ykXIszMjTZTF0vq0k=
Subject: Re: [spfbis] I-D Action: draft-ietf-spfbis-experiment-07.txt
X-BeenThere: spfbis@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: SPFbis discussion list <spfbis.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spfbis>, <mailto:spfbis-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/spfbis>
List-Post: <mailto:spfbis@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spfbis-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spfbis>, <mailto:spfbis-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 19:07:17 -0000

> -----Original Message-----
> From: spfbis-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:spfbis-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of internet-drafts@ietf.org
> Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2012 12:05 PM
> To: i-d-announce@ietf.org
> Cc: spfbis@ietf.org
> Subject: [spfbis] I-D Action: draft-ietf-spfbis-experiment-07.txt
> 
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
> directories. This draft is a work item of the SPF Update Working Group
> of the IETF.
> 
> 	Title           : Resolution of The SPF and Sender ID Experiments
> 	Author(s)       : Murray S. Kucherawy
> 	Filename        : draft-ietf-spfbis-experiment-07.txt
> 	Pages           : 11
> 	Date            : 2012-04-24
> [...]

- include Dave's suggestions, now that he's out of email jail

- add reference to RFC5507 in the appendix

- add a note that our data are admittedly a cross-section of a complete Internet survey

Co-chairs, I believe this is ready for Working Group Last Call.

-MSK

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email