IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [spfbis] Implementation status of draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis

S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com> Mon, 15 April 2013 10:16 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@elandsys.com>
X-Original-To: spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7494E21F9377 for <spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Apr 2013 03:16:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id orK6rKF-2m9H for <spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Apr 2013 03:15:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C911321F9354 for <spfbis@ietf.org>; Mon, 15 Apr 2013 03:15:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from SUBMAN.elandsys.com ([197.224.133.42]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r3FACbws017488 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 15 Apr 2013 03:12:47 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org; s=mail2010; t=1366020782; bh=AlpA4Iagk6o4lqvEXCq9jOjNsz0HdZenImW1sJ2oO+g=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=2/MI9+91NKE3CPMovYE8a2pkUctCUGu+szWMy28UyYc0NwOgcv8njQ9q3c9CcTVkg wSonsE0KMTyPSezDB97EJHmWgxMXx+ozXtxLSbWNeyU4SzVR17I5GAuZ4jMv3DU17S iB6htrT1c5BXEATe8yCUs5u7bFj5iyQUTAJqLkOQ=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=elandsys.com; s=mail; t=1366020782; i=@elandsys.com; bh=AlpA4Iagk6o4lqvEXCq9jOjNsz0HdZenImW1sJ2oO+g=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=4rWG07kDBhL8t7SH7i6flU99jXdjRCdkNvtWog3cE8wnD2SWN+DQA4TbpOtB+VL9z 2pnlGfrWG6iJPP/5lUcQ6pWLQmgCHs+nFJSAzhoZFGU+TKpWJW9OnhBnTffhJSAZVJ HncHJHVQNLVzRd3NIuOqt0AXKPxvOfXkFSMy/xZE=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20130415005153.0b0f96c8@resistor.net>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 03:12:36 -0700
To: spfbis@ietf.org
From: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
In-Reply-To: <1582356.eAhFEajm5r@scott-latitude-e6320>
References: <6.2.5.6.2.20130411030449.0ce5be80@elandnews.com> <1582356.eAhFEajm5r@scott-latitude-e6320>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Subject: Re: [spfbis] Implementation status of draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis
X-BeenThere: spfbis@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: SPFbis discussion list <spfbis.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spfbis>, <mailto:spfbis-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/spfbis>
List-Post: <mailto:spfbis@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spfbis-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spfbis>, <mailto:spfbis-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 10:16:00 -0000

At 13:33 11-04-2013, Scott Kitterman wrote:
>Here's a list of known SPF implementations, mostly based on RFC 4408:
>
>http://www.openspf.org/Implementations
>
>Given the minimal changes in functional requirements in 4408bis, I think they
>should still count in the mix some how.

I'll try and get more information about the implementation status of 
draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis by sending this message (Bcc) to the email 
addresses listed on the web page.  Please see the message at 
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/spfbis/current/msg03347.html for 
more context.  The list of changes to the SPF specification is in 
Appendix J ( http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-14 ).

Regards,
S. Moonesamy

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email