IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [spfbis] RFC7208 dual-cidr-length clarification

David Bürgin <dbuergin@gluet.ch> Thu, 01 September 2022 07:38 UTC

Return-Path: <dbuergin@gluet.ch>
X-Original-To: spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE1EBC14CE42 for <spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Sep 2022 00:38:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.108
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.108 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gluet.ch
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oE8uQurmq8Mm for <spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Sep 2022 00:38:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.gluet.ch (mail.gluet.ch [185.46.57.247]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8E0DBC14CF15 for <spfbis@ietf.org>; Thu, 1 Sep 2022 00:38:09 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gluet.ch; s=2020; t=1662017885; bh=4S4soQxBuZVEktggG7JJfxzIIhq7cN10Q2bxcTvOQjk=; h=Date:Subject:To:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=kSVd80ZzePMxD822/eJH7tl/7uvKZtTaIO8nmNcyEK7YHttBzxS/fATbQgoxuUj0e b3ODJGD86Nc9sStCO8zd7Q1KEuivPfYlXFJf3CRhoEt21rIjz4Hg7I76vFK1oxza+T 96NtT7OVZzKcDPjbj6wvgotJk503tHs56vY+/C5ioR+KJ+/1eS8XfgOUL8VobLqnQU T/7lPG9s1JKgpbnR+CwQK2Ao1r0bF7abwaCOZz+DfkT79czzjsj97dfahAwJ+FI5uz vGTfU845HGTJ9T+CoGq1AVQOuPfv0WqiDrnozjEZlUMZU9t5y11i6AfdQ/KCRmZOXr uVfgY1CYE1MSg==
Received: from [IPV6:2a02:1210:1a9a:2d00:e189:942e:467e:92c6] (unknown [IPv6:2a02:1210:1a9a:2d00:e189:942e:467e:92c6]) by mail.gluet.ch (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6A21D400D307 for <spfbis@ietf.org>; Thu, 1 Sep 2022 09:38:04 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <ea472fe2-82b8-c983-7f16-0e61433bb334@gluet.ch>
Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2022 09:38:03 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.11.0
Content-Language: en-GB
To: spfbis@ietf.org
References: <20220831204826.GN18101@netmeister.org>
From: David Bürgin <dbuergin@gluet.ch>
In-Reply-To: <20220831204826.GN18101@netmeister.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spfbis/RQQw1Qd_WYsbf1zHEoZjFMamuY4>
Subject: Re: [spfbis] RFC7208 dual-cidr-length clarification
X-BeenThere: spfbis@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: SPFbis discussion list <spfbis.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spfbis>, <mailto:spfbis-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spfbis/>
List-Post: <mailto:spfbis@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spfbis-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spfbis>, <mailto:spfbis-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2022 07:38:13 -0000

Jan Schaumann:
> Looking at a few online validators, it seems that that
> is indeed how it was implemented, so I guess at this
> point the question whether that was intended is moot.
> :-)

Well, I admit that I implemented it this way, too, in my spftrace¹
utility and library. Which is coincidentally quite similar to your
useful new ‘spf’ tool …

Cheers,
David


¹ https://crates.io/crates/spftrace

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email