IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [spfbis] RFC 4408 to draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-08 difference

S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com> Fri, 14 December 2012 20:29 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@elandsys.com>
X-Original-To: spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 620BE21F8B07 for <spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 12:29:35 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yN02QaZZ0E+j for <spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 12:29:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9055621F8B04 for <spfbis@ietf.org>; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 12:29:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from SUBMAN.elandsys.com ([197.224.159.202]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id qBEKTLwd006878 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for <spfbis@ietf.org>; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 12:29:31 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org; s=mail2010; t=1355516971; bh=L7uDfZSXCPK5p7cTKulOXfvUXCaWL0lxzTpMZtMiYGA=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=A5puFBjphqvpT2TzQf2M9cDfsiudf3vfDTkoeNFc7MnSm6caVk6JZXoYfVzOw/sqH x7TLtY7888wVT1RZ0GbSap4SUmmQDAjrYYbNtQGkyCU5Y94QtEo7w1P9XVg3H4k5FO XNLd5tG4jziGMewPOQ5nc8EFr3WEvkPJYrMBwJiU=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=elandsys.com; s=mail; t=1355516971; i=@elandsys.com; bh=L7uDfZSXCPK5p7cTKulOXfvUXCaWL0lxzTpMZtMiYGA=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=iKtcqG6Masqprwc6LGKY/xw5JVSe5Q2z21PsVWo0oXWr+vIIvCHwLRyZBmh2GW/Lh sGgoolPpLluHWYg3ahou6qm5RrmgjQo5M6zzZhuJH60rFI6GiSajX7Y2qWlT/u4DgN uvar8R/1knoek0pD5eYjvcT6xiqVMmdkgLOQ2jp8=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20121214122344.0b306450@resistor.net>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2012 12:28:26 -0800
To: spfbis@ietf.org
From: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
In-Reply-To: <1758411.Z4lZWUANF0@scott-latitude-e6320>
References: <1758411.Z4lZWUANF0@scott-latitude-e6320>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Subject: Re: [spfbis] RFC 4408 to draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-08 difference
X-BeenThere: spfbis@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: SPFbis discussion list <spfbis.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spfbis>, <mailto:spfbis-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/spfbis>
List-Post: <mailto:spfbis@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spfbis-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spfbis>, <mailto:spfbis-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2012 20:29:35 -0000

Hi Scott,
At 12:06 14-12-2012, Scott Kitterman wrote:
>The current diff from RFC 4408 is attached in rfcdiff format.  So the answer

 From the message at 
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/spfbis/current/msg03053.html

  "1.  Perform a diff between the most recent WG document (08) and
       RFC 4408.  This allows us to document precisely any differences
       between the current state of work and the starting point of the
       WG."

The diff that was posted was between RFC 4408 and 
draft-kitterman-4408bis-00.  Could you please fix?

Thanks,
S. Moonesamy

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email