Re: [spfbis] RFC7208 4.6.4 Interpretation - MX Lookup Count Inconsistencies

Jan Schaumann <jschauma@netmeister.org> Sun, 15 January 2023 22:51 UTC

Return-Path: <jschauma@netmeister.org>
X-Original-To: spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2673EC14F74A for <spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 15 Jan 2023 14:51:30 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.096
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.096 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=netmeister.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bteSvcsuZA2g for <spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 15 Jan 2023 14:51:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from panix.netmeister.org (panix.netmeister.org [166.84.7.99]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 24B4CC14F726 for <spfbis@ietf.org>; Sun, 15 Jan 2023 14:51:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: by panix.netmeister.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id D1AFA85861; Sun, 15 Jan 2023 17:51:26 -0500 (EST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=netmeister.org; s=2023; t=1673823086; bh=HmG83BRaVWS+KkVvSwUUg1OYO0iTmO3NpPmALela92w=; h=From:To:Subject:Content-Type:From:To:Subject; b=m5kiZHhqdtXnQp7yf5UsXkguACnrPVFf+gpeTI1K9dEHqXzGeHFhkMecnKhAsnhoX Ci0OSqTxmBUmuVLqEV9mzwvEzjigtBOhSU9WWE44zXGs5f+Qclds8LApv3rHQw5Ijs P+O00P0RheAx1s4kdGmhwY+q6bk/wr1aqN+1Df+IWL1LNao8vlLr21+GZG4L2MaGB6 s1bsvj5OsdBinVPgd2xWpXb24SPtNJZyo4PIfQttMdc3He9ZRkAg4JkEXH2pEW+gKM CzVnFPojG+ZDcMp8cBybUQlbrApylioq28IoDNkK0vIqAhw7R/M0pvKNrzLLA6RcQf OmJn7lCDbIHTw==
Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2023 17:51:26 -0500
From: Jan Schaumann <jschauma@netmeister.org>
To: spfbis@ietf.org
Message-ID: <Y8SDbka+5f9KG6DB@netmeister.org>
References: <79ac443e-b0ee-6598-cec0-9cf32c3dc1d1@tekmarc.com> <2052933.pCZHq2v93S@localhost> <Y8SCz4bC15iRa/tB@netmeister.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <Y8SCz4bC15iRa/tB@netmeister.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spfbis/dSvLJNg-oBmyZkzV1xgv9IX7uqE>
Subject: Re: [spfbis] RFC7208 4.6.4 Interpretation - MX Lookup Count Inconsistencies
X-BeenThere: spfbis@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: SPFbis discussion list <spfbis.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spfbis>, <mailto:spfbis-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spfbis/>
List-Post: <mailto:spfbis@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spfbis-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spfbis>, <mailto:spfbis-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2023 22:51:30 -0000

Jan Schaumann <jschauma=40netmeister.org@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:

> Is it 2 (one for the 'a' lookup, and one for the
> 'mx'), or is it 4 (one for the 'a' lookup, one for the
> 'mx' lookup, and, because MX records return host names
> and IP addresses, an additional lookup for each MX

*and not* IP addresses