Re: [spfbis] Adding a note in Section 4.8 of draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis

Douglas Otis <doug.mtview@gmail.com> Wed, 09 April 2014 22:50 UTC

Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.2 \(1874\))
From: Douglas Otis <doug.mtview@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20140409223132.GA524@mx1.yitter.info>
Date: Wed, 09 Apr 2014 15:50:42 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <E6EC1D9D-72F8-41DB-8E6B-450142168A3B@gmail.com>
References: <6.2.5.6.2.20140403141220.0d938f28@elandnews.com> <533E71AD.3070303@tana.it> <6.2.5.6.2.20140405085005.0d016970@resistor.net> <6.2.5.6.2.20140407121608.0ce967a0@resistor.net> <33DF0940-C39D-44CA-9540-303F4FEDD4EE@gmail.com> <20140409214447.GV524@mx1.yitter.info> <261B89E3-3338-4514-84DC-2C503B3F8438@gmail.com> <20140409223132.GA524@mx1.yitter.info>
To: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spfbis/faf43a2_VZ2BQOoAcsmLNR7oIlI
Cc: spfbis@ietf.org, spfbis-chairs@tools.ietf.org, S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
Subject: Re: [spfbis] Adding a note in Section 4.8 of draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis
Precedence: list

Dear Andrew,

Your modified text missed the concern.

Note:  This document and its predecessors make no provisions for defining correct handling of syntactically invalid <domain-spec> per <xref target="RFC1035"/>.  Syntax related examples include names with empty labels, such as "foo..example.com", and labels that are longer than 63 characters.  Some implementations choose to treat such errors as no-match and therefore ignore such names, while others return a "permerror" exception.  Macro expansion might be handled in a similar fashion irrespective of any related syntax issues.

Regards,
Douglas Otis

On Apr 9, 2014, at 3:31 PM, Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com> wrote:

> Doug,
> 
> On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 03:14:56PM -0700, Douglas Otis wrote:
>> The intent was to offer well considered advice.
> 
> You neatly avoided responding to my proposed text alteration, or
> suggesting different text.  Do you just want to leave macros out of
> the text at all?  Can you please either suggest altered text, or say
> that you object to the inclusion absolutely?
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> A
> 
> -- 
> Andrew Sullivan
> ajs@anvilwalrusden.com

[spfbis] Adding a note in Section 4.8 of draft-ie… S Moonesamy
Re: [spfbis] Adding a note in Section 4.8 of draf… Alessandro Vesely
Re: [spfbis] Adding a note in Section 4.8 of draf… S Moonesamy
Re: [spfbis] Adding a note in Section 4.8 of draf… S Moonesamy
Re: [spfbis] Adding a note in Section 4.8 of draf… Douglas Otis
Re: [spfbis] Adding a note in Section 4.8 of draf… Scott Kitterman
Re: [spfbis] Adding a note in Section 4.8 of draf… Douglas Otis
Re: [spfbis] Adding a note in Section 4.8 of draf… Scott Kitterman
Re: [spfbis] Adding a note in Section 4.8 of draf… S Moonesamy
Re: [spfbis] Adding a note in Section 4.8 of draf… Andrew Sullivan
Re: [spfbis] Adding a note in Section 4.8 of draf… Douglas Otis
Re: [spfbis] Adding a note in Section 4.8 of draf… Andrew Sullivan
Re: [spfbis] Adding a note in Section 4.8 of draf… Douglas Otis
Re: [spfbis] Adding a note in Section 4.8 of draf… Scott Kitterman
Re: [spfbis] Adding a note in Section 4.8 of draf… S Moonesamy
Re: [spfbis] Adding a note in Section 4.8 of draf… Scott Kitterman
Re: [spfbis] Adding a note in Section 4.8 of draf… Scott Kitterman
Re: [spfbis] Adding a note in Section 4.8 of draf… Scott Kitterman
Re: [spfbis] Adding a note in Section 4.8 of draf… Andrew Sullivan
Re: [spfbis] Adding a note in Section 4.8 of draf… Scott Kitterman
Re: [spfbis] Adding a note in Section 4.8 of draf… S Moonesamy
Re: [spfbis] Adding a note in Section 4.8 of draf… Douglas Otis
Re: [spfbis] Adding a note in Section 4.8 of draf… S Moonesamy
Re: [spfbis] Adding a note in Section 4.8 of draf… Douglas Otis
Re: [spfbis] Adding a note in Section 4.8 of draf… S Moonesamy
Re: [spfbis] Adding a note in Section 4.8 of draf… S Moonesamy