IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [spfbis] Request adoption of draft-kucherawy-spfbis-experiment

Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com> Mon, 05 March 2012 19:12 UTC

Return-Path: <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
X-Original-To: spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A467B21F88EA for <spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Mar 2012 11:12:48 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.469
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.469 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.130, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7MidSgTwkKUG for <spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Mar 2012 11:12:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.yitter.info (mail.yitter.info [208.86.224.201]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B250721F88E9 for <spfbis@ietf.org>; Mon, 5 Mar 2012 11:12:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.yitter.info (69-196-144-227.dsl.teksavvy.com [69.196.144.227]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.yitter.info (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E3D611ECB41D for <spfbis@ietf.org>; Mon, 5 Mar 2012 19:12:46 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2012 14:12:45 -0500
From: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
To: spfbis@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20120305191244.GX76465@mail.yitter.info>
References: <20120305175124.GR76465@crankycanuck.ca> <2934212.TfIHMJGsu2@scott-latitude-e6320> <20120305183017.GT76465@mail.yitter.info> <4F550BAE.8050208@isdg.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4F550BAE.8050208@isdg.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Subject: Re: [spfbis] Request adoption of draft-kucherawy-spfbis-experiment
X-BeenThere: spfbis@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: SPFbis discussion list <spfbis.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spfbis>, <mailto:spfbis-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/spfbis>
List-Post: <mailto:spfbis@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spfbis-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spfbis>, <mailto:spfbis-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2012 19:12:48 -0000

Dear colleagues,

On Mon, Mar 05, 2012 at 01:53:34PM -0500, Hector Santos wrote:
> Just consider the charter did have an document for review
> consideration. 

As I already mentioned in my note to Scott, that document will come up
in the future.  The present issue is whether to adopt the proposed
document in order to settle the question of the SPF/Sender-ID
experiment.  This is our first milestone:

Aug 2012 - A document describing the SPF/Sender-ID experiment  and its
conclusions to the IESG for publication.

Best regards,

A

PS: I acknowledge having read the rest of that message.

-- 
Andrew Sullivan
ajs@anvilwalrusden.com

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status