Re: [spfbis] I-D Action: draft-ietf-spfbis-experiment-11.txt

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com> Wed, 13 June 2012 13:57 UTC

Return-Path: <superuser@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 195B721F8468 for <spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 06:57:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.208
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.208 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.390, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QirzOnodHHdz for <spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 06:57:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lb0-f172.google.com (mail-lb0-f172.google.com [209.85.217.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F7F621F8467 for <spfbis@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 06:57:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by lbbgo11 with SMTP id go11so1524249lbb.31 for <spfbis@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 06:57:46 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=+r7rmCyji/TBt7A6qJdHSQTZPkYcUlIB0OidWf9mR4o=; b=rtA+ElXemf8Uhq6UHLSaCUDealMtUcvymCb+G7YIfbwsYtv3cjIg8Vid2rosmqd8gq D2eRIVVmRENaed0436gfmy744Vn8AzoxEOkkaTnY48avyKeYT9W2+W2naSUM4XKAtQCr P8Epi1tucAcLpkGxEu31ww0zs0+wKW6wSuPbEXXJeGiVxOUGBQMrsv5KQkboAZQ/19Vj cH4Z7rO2Nh4OdCHsX+BsXAxNuFoJoF/DM6tSb/KuuV5CdGlFRm7BAYNpOZJ7ZZ6kSgi+ ktOghNBbg394igR8hATkspzUMRAYLXFthlOoP832381REnPEPWhYaWAbkAZ/JK8kYHbJ F6jg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.152.147.33 with SMTP id th1mr24979281lab.9.1339595866100; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 06:57:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.112.89.3 with HTTP; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 06:57:45 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20120612210350.6991.33790.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
References: <20120612210350.6991.33790.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 06:57:45 -0700
Message-ID: <CAL0qLwZmWQneGtYn0TH0HfSL30b0Aaf4Z=w+xMesHPPAzpC+aA@mail.gmail.com>
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
To: spfbis@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="e89a8f22c411bdd1f504c25af78c"
Subject: Re: [spfbis] I-D Action: draft-ietf-spfbis-experiment-11.txt
X-BeenThere: spfbis@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: SPFbis discussion list <spfbis.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spfbis>, <mailto:spfbis-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/spfbis>
List-Post: <mailto:spfbis@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spfbis-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spfbis>, <mailto:spfbis-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 13:57:48 -0000

On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 2:03 PM, <internet-drafts@ietf.org> wrote:

>
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
> directories.
>  This draft is a work item of the SPF Update Working Group of the IETF.
>
>        Title           : Resolution of The SPF and Sender ID Experiments
>        Author(s)       : Murray S. Kucherawy
>        Filename        : draft-ietf-spfbis-experiment-11.txt
>        Pages           : 12
>        Date            : 2012-06-12
>
> Abstract:
>   In 2006 the IETF published a suite of protocol documents comprising
>   SPF and Sender ID, two proposed email authentication protocols.  Both
>   of these protocols enable one to publish via the Domain Name System a
>   policy declaring which mail servers were authorized to send email on
>   behalf of the domain name being queried.  There was concern that the
>   two would conflict in some significant operational situations,
>   interfering with message delivery.
>
>   The IESG required the publication of all of these documents (RFC4405,
>   RFC4406, RFC4407, and RFC4408) with Experimental status, and
>   requested that the community observe deployment and operation of the
>   protocols over a period of two years from the date of publication to
>   determine a reasonable path forward.
>
>   After six years, sufficient experience and evidence have been
>   collected that the experiments thus created can be considered
>   concluded.  This document presents those findings.
>
>
This just changes some wording about IANA procedures regarding RRTYPE
registration, at the request of IANA.

The document is now scheduled for the next IESG telechat.

-MSK