Re: [spfbis] yam
"Murray S. Kucherawy" <msk@cloudmark.com> Mon, 28 November 2011 23:37 UTC
Return-Path: <msk@cloudmark.com>
X-Original-To: spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A212821F8C7F for <spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Nov 2011 15:37:56 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WdYasDYJmHSJ for <spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Nov 2011 15:37:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ht1-outbound.cloudmark.com (ht1-outbound.cloudmark.com [72.5.239.35]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0838421F8C3D for <spfbis@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Nov 2011 15:37:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from EXCH-C2.corp.cloudmark.com ([172.22.1.74]) by malice.corp.cloudmark.com ([172.22.10.71]) with mapi; Mon, 28 Nov 2011 15:37:51 -0800
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <msk@cloudmark.com>
To: "spfbis@ietf.org" <spfbis@ietf.org>
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2011 15:37:50 -0800
Thread-Topic: [spfbis] yam
Thread-Index: AcyuI838NIWKY8T3R3SKhlhz4Pz63wAAtMWQ
Message-ID: <F5833273385BB34F99288B3648C4F06F19C6C15277@EXCH-C2.corp.cloudmark.com>
References: <CAHhFybpQ385xvS8A5ph0mRPCHDG+RLQkvueWGzc2npxT05WuoA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAHhFybpQ385xvS8A5ph0mRPCHDG+RLQkvueWGzc2npxT05WuoA@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [spfbis] yam
X-BeenThere: spfbis@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: SPFbis discussion list <spfbis.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spfbis>, <mailto:spfbis-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/spfbis>
List-Post: <mailto:spfbis@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spfbis-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spfbis>, <mailto:spfbis-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2011 23:37:56 -0000
> -----Original Message----- > From: spfbis-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:spfbis-bounces@ietf.org] On > Behalf Of Frank Ellermann > Sent: Monday, November 28, 2011 3:16 PM > To: spfbis@ietf.org > Subject: [spfbis] yam > > <URL:http://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-kitterman-4408bis-00.txt> > > Maybe we can start with something simple, update all obviously obsolete > references, s/282/532/g etc. Yup. That's one of the two starting documents. Stuff like that can be done once the WG is rolling and we have the tools to start tracking issues. Keep that one in your pocket. :-)
- [spfbis] yam Frank Ellermann
- Re: [spfbis] yam Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [spfbis] yam Frank Ellermann
- Re: [spfbis] yam SM