IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [spfbis] RFC 4408 issues list

Scott Kitterman <spf2@kitterman.com> Tue, 21 February 2012 16:24 UTC

Return-Path: <spf2@kitterman.com>
X-Original-To: spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE92A21F85A2 for <spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Feb 2012 08:24:31 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.58
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.58 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.019, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IOrL1+ocyA5W for <spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Feb 2012 08:24:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mailout02.controlledmail.com (mailout02.controlledmail.com [72.81.252.18]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D86EC21F84D1 for <spfbis@ietf.org>; Tue, 21 Feb 2012 08:24:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mailout02.controlledmail.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailout02.controlledmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54D6B20E40CC; Tue, 21 Feb 2012 11:24:12 -0500 (EST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=kitterman.com; s=2007-00; t=1329841452; bh=K84bVapOh5KTeZJjxEiqoi7VLvbjSjxrdvaRwgSrvGE=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type; b=Wc4fZrDyI51uSRwwxYLJjqYPNvz3Jj3bC2750YLn3iAbvJmmODck4MWqLLgaOr6XI HPdzYClGKn4BOdkz0gAWq48lO2bG5Rn+WVg8qmv0TYXVt+IUy2Xqi0uOCUu1IdrWm/ uBkAIlU4snaQZeP0/qbsVVV0jevz4TDImHrLLSHY=
Received: from scott-latitude-e6320.localnet (static-72-81-252-21.bltmmd.fios.verizon.net [72.81.252.21]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mailout02.controlledmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 35F0C20E4099; Tue, 21 Feb 2012 11:24:11 -0500 (EST)
From: Scott Kitterman <spf2@kitterman.com>
To: spfbis@ietf.org
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2012 11:24:11 -0500
Message-ID: <2268068.OHZpIlfS5y@scott-latitude-e6320>
User-Agent: KMail/4.7.3 (Linux/3.0.0-16-generic-pae; KDE/4.7.4; i686; ; )
In-Reply-To: <20120221161834.GC34608@mail.yitter.info>
References: <061.ab475cb67717b7fa7169bfb593bbd82f@tools.ietf.org> <3511388.PH0ytCIYaP@scott-latitude-e6320> <20120221161834.GC34608@mail.yitter.info>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-AV-Checked: ClamAV using ClamSMTP
Subject: Re: [spfbis] RFC 4408 issues list
X-BeenThere: spfbis@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: SPFbis discussion list <spfbis.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spfbis>, <mailto:spfbis-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/spfbis>
List-Post: <mailto:spfbis@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spfbis-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spfbis>, <mailto:spfbis-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2012 16:24:31 -0000

On Tuesday, February 21, 2012 11:18:35 AM Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> ... It seems to
> me that there was an IETF contribution that someone thoughtfully
> provided that could be a good start for that ...

Yes.  That was me.

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-kitterman-4408bis/

> When SM and I proposed taking this approach to the AD, the question of
> whether to discuss the methodology first was broached.  I was, and
> remain, opposed to that; all it would do is turn the management of the
> WG's process itself into another bikeshed problem.  It wouldn't be the
> first time, but I think the WG will be more productive the way we're
> going.
> 
> I hope that explains things to your satisfaction.

It doesn't, but at least I know it's on purpose now.  I'll strive for 
patience.  No promises.

Scott K

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email