Re: [spfbis] I-D Action: draft-ietf-spfbis-experiment-06.txt

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <msk@cloudmark.com> Tue, 24 April 2012 18:53 UTC

Return-Path: <msk@cloudmark.com>
X-Original-To: spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74A4A21E8042 for <spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 11:53:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.545
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.545 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.054, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vBUn7C6UgxbW for <spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 11:53:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.cloudmark.com (cmgw1.cloudmark.com [208.83.136.25]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 611EE21E8015 for <spfbis@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 11:53:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ht1-outbound.cloudmark.com ([72.5.239.25]) by mail.cloudmark.com with bizsmtp id 1t151j0010ZaKgw01t15SS; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 10:01:05 -0700
X-CMAE-Match: 0
X-CMAE-Score: 0.00
X-CMAE-Analysis: v=2.0 cv=fNu7LOme c=1 sm=1 a=LdFkGDrDWH2mcjCZERnC4w==:17 a=LvckAehuu68A:10 a=TFlDA43ftUwA:10 a=zutiEJmiVI4A:10 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=xqWC_Br6kY4A:10 a=48vgC7mUAAAA:8 a=UorN8W0AsddBR7n4ihcA:9 a=Lr7FgknFOVOTcAUkUO8A:7 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=lZB815dzVvQA:10 a=LdFkGDrDWH2mcjCZERnC4w==:117
Received: from EXCH-MBX901.corp.cloudmark.com ([fe80::addf:849a:f71c:4a82]) by exch-htcas901.corp.cloudmark.com ([fe80::2524:76b6:a865:539c%10]) with mapi id 14.01.0355.002; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 10:00:44 -0700
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <msk@cloudmark.com>
To: "spfbis@ietf.org" <spfbis@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [spfbis] I-D Action: draft-ietf-spfbis-experiment-06.txt
Thread-Index: AQHNIjt/8wp/QpgekkCkeiki0ytcsZaqMrWQ
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 17:00:43 +0000
Message-ID: <9452079D1A51524AA5749AD23E003928100CA5@exch-mbx901.corp.cloudmark.com>
References: <20120424165837.3747.64469.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <20120424165837.3747.64469.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [172.20.2.121]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cloudmark.com; s=default; t=1335286865; bh=Z9zxtwMzg6HW46N6Ni6cGn3r5/Lo3s4iPKF2RIiSN5c=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:References:In-Reply-To: Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; b=k+m8CB3dN5X4oh8vl1/y3e+Gb6CgJ2xTFjUwHqqJ0ESKWsh127/2Q66Sly2uDZ9TZ VMWOiZ0AD4WnYMwx6dLA+jjFIWMtKO7vAFgib3lqEZNkWjhxgonW3s9euB3GhiTafn 3vO+nKJ3ugcEmY+Cv/sLsxQzToaPYgodGw704r48=
Subject: Re: [spfbis] I-D Action: draft-ietf-spfbis-experiment-06.txt
X-BeenThere: spfbis@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: SPFbis discussion list <spfbis.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spfbis>, <mailto:spfbis-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/spfbis>
List-Post: <mailto:spfbis@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spfbis-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spfbis>, <mailto:spfbis-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 18:53:17 -0000

> -----Original Message-----
> From: spfbis-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:spfbis-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of internet-drafts@ietf.org
> Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2012 9:59 AM
> To: i-d-announce@ietf.org
> Cc: spfbis@ietf.org
> Subject: [spfbis] I-D Action: draft-ietf-spfbis-experiment-06.txt
> 
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
> directories. This draft is a work item of the SPF Update Working Group
> of the IETF.
> 
> 	Title           : Resolution of The SPF and Sender ID Experiments
> 	Author(s)       : Murray S. Kucherawy
> 	Filename        : draft-ietf-spfbis-experiment-06.txt
> 	Pages           : 11
> 	Date            : 2012-04-24
> [...]

Changes in this version:

- all of Barry's suggestions included

- clarify that only syntactically valid replies were included in the DNS numbers

-MSK