Re: [SPKM] Interoperability

Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf@mit.edu> Tue, 31 October 2006 21:19 UTC

Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Gf10w-00045t-Js; Tue, 31 Oct 2006 16:19:18 -0500
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Gf10t-00045H-M6 for spkm@ietf.org; Tue, 31 Oct 2006 16:19:17 -0500
Received: from carter-zimmerman.dyn.mit.edu ([18.188.3.148] helo=carter-zimmerman.mit.edu) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Gf10r-0001Yp-LB for spkm@ietf.org; Tue, 31 Oct 2006 16:19:15 -0500
Received: by carter-zimmerman.mit.edu (Postfix, from userid 8042) id 23628E0035; Tue, 31 Oct 2006 16:19:05 -0500 (EST)
From: Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf@mit.edu>
To: Nicolas Williams <Nicolas.Williams@sun.com>
Subject: Re: [SPKM] Interoperability
References: <tsl4ptkthkp.fsf@cz.mit.edu> <20061031211246.GT28107@binky.Central.Sun.COM>
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 16:19:04 -0500
In-Reply-To: <20061031211246.GT28107@binky.Central.Sun.COM> (Nicolas Williams's message of "Tue, 31 Oct 2006 15:12:46 -0600")
Message-ID: <tsliri0rxo7.fsf@cz.mit.edu>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 93238566e09e6e262849b4f805833007
Cc: spkm@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: spkm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Low Infrastructure Public Key GSS mechanism <spkm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spkm>, <mailto:spkm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/spkm>
List-Post: <mailto:spkm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spkm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spkm>, <mailto:spkm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: spkm-bounces@ietf.org

>>>>> "Nicolas" == Nicolas Williams <Nicolas.Williams@sun.com> writes:

    Nicolas> On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 02:23:50PM -0500, Sam Hartman
    Nicolas> wrote:
    >> * When will we get a spec out?  How long will the market wait?
    >> Sometimes, you have to accept that the market will deploy
    >> something and you have little influence on it.  In those cases
    >> it's better to write a compelling spec and hope that people
    >> will migrate.  Other times, if you can stretch to meet market
    >> timing, you can avoid the market deploying something that does
    >> not meet your spec.  That is very desirable.

    Nicolas> If we cannot get a spec that will meet our needs in time
    Nicolas> for the market then the proposed protocol could go to
    Nicolas> Informational and a spec that does meet our needs can
    Nicolas> later go to Proposed-Standard, using a different OID.

Yes.
I don't consider it a failure if the market has to do something while we work on a spec.

I will not sponsor this as informational, but nothing stops the
authors from going to the rfc editor.



_______________________________________________
SPKM mailing list
SPKM@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spkm