[splices] Fwd: Progressing the INVOKE-related work
Gonzalo Camarillo <Gonzalo.Camarillo@ericsson.com> Mon, 25 July 2011 21:41 UTC
Return-Path: <gonzalo.camarillo@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: splices@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: splices@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8614511E80BA for <splices@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 14:41:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.606
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.606 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.007, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tmLtFpNGJi19 for <splices@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 14:41:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailgw9.se.ericsson.net (mailgw9.se.ericsson.net [193.180.251.57]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C576921F8BD3 for <splices@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 14:41:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb39-b7bfdae000005125-9f-4e2de2fe4076
Received: from esessmw0247.eemea.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.124]) by mailgw9.se.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id DB.57.20773.EF2ED2E4; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 23:41:19 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [131.160.126.141] (153.88.115.8) by esessmw0247.eemea.ericsson.se (153.88.115.94) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 8.3.137.0; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 23:41:18 +0200
Message-ID: <4E2DE2FC.1050900@ericsson.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 17:41:16 -0400
From: Gonzalo Camarillo <Gonzalo.Camarillo@ericsson.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.9.2.18) Gecko/20110616 Thunderbird/3.1.11
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: splices@ietf.org
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA==
Subject: [splices] Fwd: Progressing the INVOKE-related work
X-BeenThere: splices@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Loosely-coupled SIP Devices \(splices\) working group discussion list" <splices.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/splices>, <mailto:splices-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/splices>
List-Post: <mailto:splices@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:splices-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/splices>, <mailto:splices-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 21:41:20 -0000
FYI. -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Progressing the INVOKE-related work Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 17:35:38 -0400 From: Gonzalo Camarillo <Gonzalo.Camarillo@ericsson.com> To: rai@ietf.org Folks, as you know, the following draft has lately been discussed in the SPLICES and RAI area mailing lists: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-yusef-splices-invoke/ >From all the discussions, there seems to be interest in working on a call/device control mechanism. In order to do that, we need to clearly define the scope of such an effort (i.e., which types of primitives would be in scope and which ones wouldn't). In addition to defining the scope, there are open issues related to how to model the mechanism (i.e., using SIP directly vs. using SIP to establish a control channel). They will need to be resolved at some point as well. As some people have pointed out, the charter of SPLICES excludes working on such a mechanism. Therefore, the next step is to have DISPATCH work on a charter proposal for this effort. Nevertheless, we want to take advantage of the current momentum behind this effort. So, this topic will be discussed in SPLICES, as planned, during the IETF. Cheers, Gonzalo
- [splices] Fwd: Progressing the INVOKE-related work Gonzalo Camarillo
- Re: [splices] Fwd: Progressing the INVOKE-related… Simon Pietro Romano
- Re: [splices] Fwd: Progressing the INVOKE-related… Gonzalo Camarillo