[splices] Regarding draft-yusef-splices-invoke-01
"Jeremy Laurenson (jlaurens)" <jlaurens@cisco.com> Fri, 29 July 2011 01:17 UTC
Return-Path: <jlaurens@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: splices@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: splices@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18F8E21F8B2D for <splices@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Jul 2011 18:17:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.864
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.864 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=1.396, RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO=2.067]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3fhkNizrB5zt for <splices@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Jul 2011 18:17:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com [173.37.86.79]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C2CC21F8B29 for <splices@ietf.org>; Thu, 28 Jul 2011 18:17:56 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=jlaurens@cisco.com; l=428; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1311902276; x=1313111876; h=subject:from:message-id:date:to: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=s3fZ99bLEAoJcglrEMaujMt94I3pPs5W05W+l6e2idg=; b=AmuKVzdgHr6VTrEDZmzMec03ednmyn6BJYKwpgFR49SarBus2TDIfF5V ii3qyxiD2FzAxjIxEXhxhl7aZoAB1OL3LKcDztSnBeLy4iLUfu780srFV KFQf9Hp7UkTK5QyRZvJhTZC6AQ6D+nyBmIahKmTM3MBc1RWZWcuJrw0Iz o=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ArcJAPgIMk6tJV2b/2dsb2JhbAA3AQEDFAErWAFvUgEFPoh3jzmOImMCd6sSgSOeR4ViXwSHWosghQ+Lcg
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.67,285,1309737600"; d="scan'208";a="7604127"
Received: from rcdn-core-4.cisco.com ([173.37.93.155]) by rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com with ESMTP; 29 Jul 2011 01:17:56 +0000
Received: from xbh-rcd-202.cisco.com (xbh-rcd-202.cisco.com [72.163.62.201]) by rcdn-core-4.cisco.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p6T1Hurk019945 for <splices@ietf.org>; Fri, 29 Jul 2011 01:17:56 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-109.cisco.com ([72.163.62.151]) by xbh-rcd-202.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Thu, 28 Jul 2011 20:17:55 -0500
Received: from 72.163.62.204 ([72.163.62.204]) by XMB-RCD-109.cisco.com ([72.163.62.151]) with Microsoft Exchange Server HTTP-DAV ; Fri, 29 Jul 2011 01:17:54 +0000
From: "Jeremy Laurenson (jlaurens)" <jlaurens@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Message-ID: <6A06244A-A3A2-45E1-BBFC-BD7CE981C69D@cisco.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 20:17:46 -0500
To: splices@ietf.org
Thread-Topic: Regarding draft-yusef-splices-invoke-01
Thread-Index: AcxNjVg58trC/P9lTGqAPoMAz0jUkQ==
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0 (iPad Mail 8L1)
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 29 Jul 2011 01:17:56.0143 (UTC) FILETIME=[58BD4BF0:01CC4D8D]
Subject: [splices] Regarding draft-yusef-splices-invoke-01
X-BeenThere: splices@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Loosely-coupled SIP Devices \(splices\) working group discussion list" <splices.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/splices>, <mailto:splices-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/splices>
List-Post: <mailto:splices@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:splices-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/splices>, <mailto:splices-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2011 01:17:57 -0000
As per section 2, "There is no way for the REFER-issuer to ask the REFER-recipient to keep the dialog after the refer event.", yet we specifically omit the "very important" urn:invoke:call:initiate functionality since the REFER method already provides for this. I may be missing something (likely this week) but that seems like it may have consequences down the road terms of keeping the dialog open, no? J
- [splices] Regarding draft-yusef-splices-invoke-01 Jeremy Laurenson (jlaurens)
- Re: [splices] Regarding draft-yusef-splices-invok… Worley, Dale R (Dale)