Re: [splices] SPLICES IETF-80 meeting minutes and start of ML discussion

Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@cisco.com> Thu, 14 April 2011 21:57 UTC

Return-Path: <pkyzivat@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: splices@ietfc.amsl.com
Delivered-To: splices@ietfc.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfc.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C30DBE0791 for <splices@ietfc.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 Apr 2011 14:57:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.492
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.492 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.107, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([208.66.40.236]) by localhost (ietfc.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5eBMmI39tvq8 for <splices@ietfc.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 Apr 2011 14:57:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sj-iport-4.cisco.com (sj-iport-4.cisco.com [171.68.10.86]) by ietfc.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1040E0715 for <splices@ietf.org>; Thu, 14 Apr 2011 14:57:07 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=pkyzivat@cisco.com; l=1832; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1302818227; x=1304027827; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject:references: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Qt4kdBeXqtFmOvZVPKC3Yg9HtgFqmW6VVQsP9eagpWg=; b=FmU1ftBlXmMIvzuyFNL6YyxooqttvYFN4dvxkAGlH+ue4gkasaCDO12U BMFyJ/tg7MIQxcFBk2GrswPiZ8mWuEqpYzoPNPWp+iQZVLb4dzJ9tLLE3 N4uH95302PQGn2hSuIQk0xdQjYTESFrTRLynbBVXYkX24tUcNowiHoUGd 4=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AjMHAJJsp02tJXHB/2dsb2JhbACYPI0/d4hvniqdBYVuBI1vg3M
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.64,213,1301875200"; d="scan'208";a="282965148"
Received: from rcdn-core2-6.cisco.com ([173.37.113.193]) by sj-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP; 14 Apr 2011 21:57:06 +0000
Received: from [161.44.174.125] (dhcp-161-44-174-125.cisco.com [161.44.174.125]) by rcdn-core2-6.cisco.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p3ELv6sU009671 for <splices@ietf.org>; Thu, 14 Apr 2011 21:57:06 GMT
Message-ID: <4DA76DB2.8020600@cisco.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 17:57:06 -0400
From: Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110303 Thunderbird/3.1.9
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: splices@ietf.org
References: <4DA762EF.60007@unina.it>
In-Reply-To: <4DA762EF.60007@unina.it>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-15"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [splices] SPLICES IETF-80 meeting minutes and start of ML discussion
X-BeenThere: splices@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Loosely-coupled SIP Devices \(splices\) working group discussion list" <splices.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/splices>, <mailto:splices-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/splices>
List-Post: <mailto:splices@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:splices-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/splices>, <mailto:splices-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 21:57:08 -0000

On 4/14/2011 5:11 PM, Simon Pietro Romano wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I went again through the SPLICES session recording in order to derive a
> "faithful" summary of the things we discussed. You'll find SPLICES
> minutes at the following URL:
> http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/80/minutes/splices.txt

Wow! You have a promising future as a secretary taking dictation!

> I encourage all of you to go and have a look at them in order to:
> 1. notify me in case you find something which needs
> revision/re-interpretation;
> 2. check once more the main lines of discussion we had in Prague.

Yup, its consistent with what I remember.

> As decided at the end of the meeting, I am herein also asking you to
> formally express your opinion on the main topic we tackled at the
> meeting and which I am copying below:
>
> "Do people believe that all the burden of this service should be on the
> side implementing the service itself?"

I think my position is clear: YES

> I remind you that the sense of the room at last IETF was clearly in
> favor of this solution, which means that we CANNOT touch the far end of
> the session when designing the SPLICES solution.
>
> This said, I warmly invite all of the people who participated in the
> SPLICES session and who fruitfully contributed to the discussion to
> dedicate some of their cycles to SPLICES. I personally keep on thinking
> that we might do some good work here.
> Finally, I encourage the authors of the documents we have been
> discussing so far to raise their voice and explicitly declare: (i) their
> willingness to proceed with the work they proposed; (ii) the main path
> forward they currently envisage in order to let the documents we
> discussed progress.
>
> Let's try and come out of this limbo!
>
> Cheers,
>
> Simon
>
>