Re: [splices] FW: New Version Notification for draft-loreto-splices-disaggregated-media-02.txt

Peter Musgrave <musgravepj@gmail.com> Tue, 28 June 2011 22:17 UTC

Return-Path: <musgravepj@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: splices@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: splices@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65AAF21F8662 for <splices@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 15:17:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ozrlqi5eJlhD for <splices@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 15:17:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-fx0-f54.google.com (mail-fx0-f54.google.com [209.85.161.54]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 544D821F865C for <splices@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 15:17:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by fxe4 with SMTP id 4so894595fxe.27 for <splices@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 15:17:30 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=rbeFgbL50UoJp0jqUKwL1wF3K2aeghCDyBjQh1Ri08A=; b=O2RdKvdkOoMew/ca33KK2kmokwu6Y5Eotd9UKktNou43d4hjkQ0KaOXElU74OWJakU 2/oBPfyhzyiWN08pAq51/QwyRtfXlG8eErLBI4OY9EWEAc0T/IweLhZMPutNI1ki7pPg mlZZZ5xEwyYXadc5Sd7Rc3Uw9+ZF3LmVH4jow=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.223.47.209 with SMTP id o17mr81997faf.129.1309299450417; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 15:17:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.223.108.18 with HTTP; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 15:17:30 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <6369CB70BFD88942B9705AC1E639A33822CE7CF83F@DC-US1MBEX4.global.avaya.com>
References: <AQHMMzqBy1sccPwpBkmAYEmBU4E3tA==> <6369CB70BFD88942B9705AC1E639A33822CE7CF83F@DC-US1MBEX4.global.avaya.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 18:17:30 -0400
Message-ID: <BANLkTimUMzip48s9oHMFno-sePeSWKEv0g@mail.gmail.com>
From: Peter Musgrave <musgravepj@gmail.com>
To: "Shekh-Yusef, Rifaat (Rifaat)" <rifatyu@avaya.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00151747598ca5935f04a6cd08ef
Cc: "splices@ietf.org" <splices@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [splices] FW: New Version Notification for draft-loreto-splices-disaggregated-media-02.txt
X-BeenThere: splices@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Loosely-coupled SIP Devices \(splices\) working group discussion list" <splices.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/splices>, <mailto:splices-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/splices>
List-Post: <mailto:splices@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:splices-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/splices>, <mailto:splices-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 22:17:35 -0000

HI Rifaat,

I like the additions to the draft - makes it very concrete.

This matches what I remember being discussed on the list. It seems that an
unstated principle in section 4 is that the device which will establish the
audio connection is the device which answers the call, even if it is not in
the controller role. Is it worthwhile making that principle explicit?

Do you envisage a case where the device taking only video is the one to
answer the call?

Regards,

Peter Musgrave

On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 9:14 AM, Shekh-Yusef, Rifaat (Rifaat) <
rifatyu@avaya.com>; wrote:

> Hi,
>
> We have just submitted a new version for the
> draft-loreto-splices-disaggregated-media draft.
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-loreto-splices-disaggregated-media/
>
> We would appreciate it if you review it and provide us with your feedback.
>
> Regards,
>  Rifaat
>
> ________________________________________
> From: internet-drafts@ietf.org [internet-drafts@ietf.org]
> Sent: Saturday, June 25, 2011 9:11 AM
> To: Shekh-Yusef, Rifaat (Rifaat)
> Cc: salvatore.loreto@ericsson.com; Shekh-Yusef, Rifaat (Rifaat);
> gonzalo.camarillo@ericsson.com
> Subject: New Version Notification for
> draft-loreto-splices-disaggregated-media-02.txt
>
> A new version of I-D, draft-loreto-splices-disaggregated-media-02.txt has
> been successfully submitted by Rifaat Shekh-Yusef and posted to the IETF
> repository.
>
> Filename:        draft-loreto-splices-disaggregated-media
> Revision:        02
> Title:           Disaggregated Media in the Session Initiation Protocol
> (SIP)
> Creation date:   2011-06-25
> WG ID:           Individual Submission
> Number of pages: 18
>
> Abstract:
>   Disaggregated media refers to the ability for a user to create a
>   multimedia session combining different media streams, coming from
>   different devices under his or her control, so that they are treated
>   by the far end of the session as a single media session.  This
>   document lists several use cases that involve disaggregated media in
>   SIP.  Additionally, this document analyzes what types of
>   disaggregated media can be implemented using existing protocol
>   mechanisms, and the pros and cons of using each of those mechanisms.
>   Finally, this document describes scenarios that are not covered by
>   current mechanisms and proposes new IETF work to cover them.
>
>
>
>
> The IETF Secretariat
> _______________________________________________
> splices mailing list
> splices@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/splices
>