Re: [splices] FW: New Version Notification for draft-loreto-splices-disaggregated-media-02.txt

Salvatore Loreto <salvatore.loreto@ericsson.com> Wed, 06 July 2011 19:05 UTC

Return-Path: <salvatore.loreto@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: splices@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: splices@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05E7F21F8A8B for <splices@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Jul 2011 12:05:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mMyFOtmng8Pp for <splices@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Jul 2011 12:05:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailgw9.se.ericsson.net (mailgw9.se.ericsson.net [193.180.251.57]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 132EB21F8A81 for <splices@ietf.org>; Wed, 6 Jul 2011 12:05:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb39-b7bfdae000005125-1f-4e14b1ee3313
Received: from esessmw0237.eemea.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.124]) by mailgw9.se.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id C8.87.20773.EE1B41E4; Wed, 6 Jul 2011 21:05:19 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mail.lmf.ericsson.se (153.88.115.8) by esessmw0237.eemea.ericsson.se (153.88.115.91) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 8.3.137.0; Wed, 6 Jul 2011 21:05:18 +0200
Received: from nomadiclab.lmf.ericsson.se (nomadiclab.lmf.ericsson.se [131.160.33.3]) by mail.lmf.ericsson.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81C01245D for <splices@ietf.org>; Wed, 6 Jul 2011 22:05:18 +0300 (EEST)
Received: from nomadiclab.lmf.ericsson.se (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nomadiclab.lmf.ericsson.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A728511F6 for <splices@ietf.org>; Wed, 6 Jul 2011 22:05:18 +0300 (EEST)
Received: from Salvatore-Loretos-MacBook-Pro.local (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nomadiclab.lmf.ericsson.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9FC7510CE for <splices@ietf.org>; Wed, 6 Jul 2011 22:05:17 +0300 (EEST)
Message-ID: <4E14B1ED.6070900@ericsson.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2011 22:05:17 +0300
From: Salvatore Loreto <salvatore.loreto@ericsson.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.18) Gecko/20110616 Thunderbird/3.1.11
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: splices@ietf.org
References: <6369CB70BFD88942B9705AC1E639A33822CE7CF83F@DC-US1MBEX4.global.avaya.com> <CD5674C3CD99574EBA7432465FC13C1B222B1F573A@DC-US1MBEX4.global.avaya.com>
In-Reply-To: <CD5674C3CD99574EBA7432465FC13C1B222B1F573A@DC-US1MBEX4.global.avaya.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP
X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA==
Subject: Re: [splices] FW: New Version Notification for draft-loreto-splices-disaggregated-media-02.txt
X-BeenThere: splices@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Loosely-coupled SIP Devices \(splices\) working group discussion list" <splices.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/splices>, <mailto:splices-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/splices>
List-Post: <mailto:splices@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:splices-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/splices>, <mailto:splices-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Jul 2011 19:05:21 -0000

On 7/6/11 9:43 PM, Worley, Dale R (Dale) wrote:
> ________________________________________
> From: splices-bounces@ietf.org [splices-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Shekh-Yusef, Rifaat (Rifaat) [rifatyu@avaya.com]
>
> We have just submitted a new version for the draft-loreto-splices-disaggregated-media draft.
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-loreto-splices-disaggregated-media/
> ________________________________________
>
> If I understand the document correctly, it's a use-cases document, not a requirements document,
> or a solution document.
Hi Dale

you are right, this is a use-cases documents

> One use case I don't see is where both ends of the call are using disaggregation (or should it be
> aggregation?) simultaneously.
well that use case would be really interesting in the case of 
disaggregation,
not so sure if  for the aggregation one, that the wg is now investigating,
would add anything

cheers
/Sal

-- 
Salvatore Loreto
www.sloreto.com