Re: [spring] [mpls] FW: New Version Notification for draft-bryant-mpls-unified-ip-sr-01.txt

"Andrew G. Malis" <agmalis@gmail.com> Fri, 11 August 2017 19:22 UTC

Return-Path: <agmalis@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87FB5131DB6; Fri, 11 Aug 2017 12:22:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qC-Z0VGtP1q3; Fri, 11 Aug 2017 12:22:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oi0-x22c.google.com (mail-oi0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A0B03120713; Fri, 11 Aug 2017 12:22:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oi0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id x3so41993672oia.1; Fri, 11 Aug 2017 12:22:26 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=4a8gJsNgq8aXBU8zQbuVC4DaR1HoR5nr4g/flbzDRqo=; b=XFvH9/36GEDiQESl6ZJKm/DNOd9prNzKoDuly4mI63/j2/2Pj/Tn1hVkz+QakDLWqa EKO/A97J5bZsnXNHozWzWd/02pBbel23HLQEhii3l44UyU4wyzqZC10O0ASS/Mit5Td3 0OG5zBozuG5/Kr/vwuC9vnkRL7soy5vbAAtZn+jEjGecWa63DVEiindOb3rDjS4KSMGW FIUZkmrSoN+UQ8yueCxbd9oeof2jrWR0wXtgeyUkE4nJDtKaR5dTJ14J0f60nmlA9B70 Yq789Z6TBnAs00R4RiUKO2bmtQ2QQUGzOppIwLazc8AYRCW5IQ4k4ni1PNw9zutlOwyW hcsQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=4a8gJsNgq8aXBU8zQbuVC4DaR1HoR5nr4g/flbzDRqo=; b=UucmXu/8ej2WseeqDRer7Zz16sqG/qq8AsTKTpFVTQbrsJL9qZcH8yYft9WxjqIFE6 CJyrhPcpAcRMW2k89KkK6V/mGlbnT6QDA4kTo22E04leDWk9dfdE1GbHo7TLEncQAZy9 d0snJSMo6mNF1jBueCJYEnbpKgUkraWG+fUsx7w6CamstU1FGYJ1Qm96XCBCql6RGDOz JHGpLvT34XyhsGZptAipo0AXIF0DX/AAQdfNsV+HuXIWC64jpxtHF8/41/kherlMuLUm fJY/PFK3GEp/PVtMv70DpeX8+wJR9R5l07n/DVwVsGrZT44ZU27pl5+x7rjIkABCcGQD siNQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AHYfb5ikTine1/ONiuMEa01dSZwxcVxrT72V0qzAxekR/8/ZjX6KTvYc OVu2ec6xZ5Q7fSbZGqS8KU51csMhmQ==
X-Received: by 10.202.213.79 with SMTP id m76mr17758953oig.54.1502479346025; Fri, 11 Aug 2017 12:22:26 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.182.232.34 with HTTP; Fri, 11 Aug 2017 12:22:05 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <053e01d312d3$1dcba0c0$5962e240$@olddog.co.uk>
References: <150247679913.24555.11731619545096839826.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <e757ba5b317644d589fa4b536c724cc2@CO2PR05MB971.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <053e01d312d3$1dcba0c0$5962e240$@olddog.co.uk>
From: "Andrew G. Malis" <agmalis@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2017 15:22:05 -0400
Message-ID: <CAA=duU2fU-QnHAj=bbN9-WTEqTLw4+fPn7sdhkpcPNSvp-VnBA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
Cc: "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>, "spring@ietf.org" <spring@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a113acab2b3ccea05567f3b07"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/0FMOmoi9H8Su2qd6Hex_AV8vIV4>
Subject: Re: [spring] [mpls] FW: New Version Notification for draft-bryant-mpls-unified-ip-sr-01.txt
X-BeenThere: spring@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Stacked Tunnels for Source Routing \(STATUS\)." <spring.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spring/>
List-Post: <mailto:spring@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2017 19:22:30 -0000

Adrian,

I think this is a straightforward draft that provides valuable
functionality, especially SR within an IP (v4 or v6) network as discussed
in section 6.2. I certainly support it going forward. I don’t personally
have a strong opinion whether MPLS or SPRING is the proper place to pursue
the work, as long as it is pursued. I’m happy to let the WG chairs and ADs
figure that out.

Cheers,
Andy


On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 2:53 PM, Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk> wrote:

> All,
>
> The presentation of this draft in Prague seemed to be well received and we
> got
> some comments that we have stated to act on in this revision.
>
> One, non-technical request was to share the work with the SPRING working
> group,
> and I have just done that.
>
> At the meeting I noted that...
> > The authors think this is in charter for MPLS
> > But polish and discussion is needed before we ask for adoption
>
> As this polish continues, I'd like to ask the list what they think of this
> work.
> Is it going in the right direction? Is it work that you support?
>
> Thanks,
> Adrian
>
> > ________________________________________
> > From: internet-drafts@ietf.org
> > Sent: 11 August 2017 19:39:59 (UTC+00:00) Dublin, Edinburgh, Lisbon,
> London
> > To: Stewart Bryant; John E Drake; Adrian Farrel
> > Subject: New Version Notification for draft-bryant-mpls-unified-ip-
> sr-01.txt
> >
> > A new version of I-D, draft-bryant-mpls-unified-ip-sr-01.txt
> > has been successfully submitted by Adrian Farrel and posted to the
> > IETF repository.
> >
> > Name:           draft-bryant-mpls-unified-ip-sr
> > Revision:       01
> > Title:          A Unified Approach to IP Segment Routing
> > Document date:  2017-08-11
> > Group:          Individual Submission
> > Pages:          16
> > URL:
> https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-bryant-mpls-unified-ip-sr-
> > 01.txt
> > Status:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-bryant-mpls-unified-ip-sr/
> > Htmlized:       https://tools.ietf.org/html/
> draft-bryant-mpls-unified-ip-sr-01
> > Htmlized:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-bryant-mpls-unified-ip-
> > sr-01
> > Diff:
> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-bryant-mpls-unified-ip-sr-01
> >
> > Abstract:
> >    Segment routing is a source routed forwarding method that allows
> >    packets to be steered through a network on paths other than the
> >    shortest path derived from the routing protocol.  The approach uses
> >    information encoded in the packet header to partially or completely
> >    specify the route the packet takes through the network, and does not
> >    make use of a signaling protocol to pre-install paths in the network.
> >
> >    Two different encapsulations have been defined to enable segment
> >    routing in an MPLS network and in an IPv6 network.  While
> >    acknowledging that there is a strong need to support segment routing
> >    in both environments, this document defines a converged, unified
> >    approach to segment routing that enables a single mechanism to be
> >    applied in both types of network.  The resulting approach is also
> >    applicable to IPv4 networks without the need for any changes to the
> >    IPv4 specification.
> >
> >    This document makes no changes to the segment routing architecture
> >    and builds on existing protocol mechanisms such as the encapsulation
> >    of MPLS within UDP defined in RFC 7510.
> >
> >    No new procedures are introduced, but existing mechanisms are
> >    combined to achieve the desired result.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of
> submission
> > until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
> >
> > The IETF Secretariat
>
> _______________________________________________
> mpls mailing list
> mpls@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
>