Re: [spring] Fwd: IETF WG state changed to WGLC for draft-ietf-spring-srv6-srh-compression

"yuanhang@unionpay.com" <yuanhang@unionpay.com> Tue, 23 January 2024 02:52 UTC

Return-Path: <yuanhang@unionpay.com>
X-Original-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1652C14CF1D for <spring@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Jan 2024 18:52:22 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.101
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.101 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_FONT_FACE_BAD=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, RDNS_NONE=0.793, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_KAM_HTML_FONT_INVALID=0.01, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1W3rlH8sqn_y for <spring@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Jan 2024 18:52:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gateway2.unionpay.com (unknown [101.52.124.204]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9F5F8C14F70D for <spring@ietf.org>; Mon, 22 Jan 2024 18:52:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ws.xjs.cn (unionpay.com [172.30.1.31] (may be forged)) by gateway2.unionpay.com with ESMTP id 40N2q09I014018 for <spring@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Jan 2024 10:52:01 +0800 (+08) (envelope-from yuanhang@unionpay.com)
Received: from ws.xjs.cn (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by ws.xjs.cn (Postfix) with ESMTP id 358E45BD772E for <spring@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Jan 2024 10:52:00 +0800 (CST)
Received: from unionpay.com (unknown [172.30.1.35]) by ws.xjs.cn (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25E785BD7710 for <spring@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Jan 2024 10:52:00 +0800 (CST)
Received: from 01093029PC3 (unknown [172.20.34.24]) by APP3 (Coremail) with SMTP id IwEerAB3OvHMKa9lzNUyAA--.24502S2; Tue, 23 Jan 2024 10:51:56 +0800 (CST)
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2024 10:51:56 +0800
From: "yuanhang@unionpay.com" <yuanhang@unionpay.com>
To: spring <spring@ietf.org>
References: <170586510260.16370.1815267482387419323@ietfa.amsl.com>, <46316266-d63e-4db7-832d-53c7e84f2359@joelhalpern.com>, <20240122224522631227212@chinamobile.com>, <CAG=3OHc4aOAhuQ8NJB1JWYHaHZPvcJ-g-VFg7MT45xLuZRKd1g@mail.gmail.com>
X-Priority: 3
X-GUID: 6B840405-38D1-469B-AC1E-126CF0B0D4D3
X-Has-Attach: no
X-Mailer: Foxmail 7.2.11.303[cn]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <2024012310515584214698@unionpay.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_001_NextPart126427726741_=----"
X-CM-TRANSID: IwEerAB3OvHMKa9lzNUyAA--.24502S2
X-Coremail-Antispam: 1UD129KBjvJXoWxWr4kAFyDGFy8KF4fury8Zrb_yoW5XF1fpa yagr4xCr95Gr1kXw4v93Wjyw1UAFWrZrW5t3W5tr1UAa45KF1kKr12ywn8XFyDGrWfCr48 Zr4293s8Xa1Yv3DanT9S1TB71UUUUUUqnTZGkaVYY2UrUUUUjbIjqfuFe4nvWSU5nxnvy2 9KBjDU0xBIdaVrnRJUUUmYb7Iv0xC_Cr1lb4IE77IF4wAFF20E14v26r1j6r4UM7CY07I2 0VC2zVCF04k26cxKx2IYs7xG6rWj6s0DM7CIcVAFz4kK6r1j6r18M28lY4IEw2IIxxk0rw A2F7IY1VAKz4vEj48ve4kI8wA2z4x0Y4vE2Ix0cI8IcVAFwI0_tr0E3s1l84ACjcxK6xII jxv20xvEc7CjxVAFwI0_Cr1j6rxdM28EF7xvwVC2z280aVAFwI0_GcCE3s1l84ACjcxK6I 8E87Iv6xkF7I0E14v26rxl6s0DM2AIxVAIcxkEcVAq07x20xvEncxIr21l5I8CrVCF0I0E 4I0vr24l5I8CrVC2j2CEjI02ccxYII8I67AEr4CY67k08wAqx4xG6I80eVAI3cIFxVC2b4 A2awAv7VC0I7IYx2IY67AKxVWUJVWUGwAv7VC2z280aVAFwI0_Jr0_Gr1lOx8S6xCaFVCj c4AY6r1j6r4UM4x0Y48IcxkI7VAKI48JM4xvF2IEb7IF0Fy264kE64k0F24lFcxC0VAYjx AxZF0Ex2IqxwCF04k20xvY0x0EwIxGrwCFx2IqxVCFs4IE7xkEbVWUJVW8JwC20s026c02 F40E14v26r106r1rMI8I3I0E7480Y4vE14v26r106r1rMI8E67AF67kF1VAFwI0_Jr0_Jr ylIxkGc2Ij64vIr41lIxAIcVC0I7IYx2IY67AKxVWUJVWUCwCI42IY6xIIjxv20xvEc7Cj xVAFwI0_Jr0_Gr1lIxAIcVCF04k26cxKx2IYs7xG6r1j6r1xMIIF0xvEx4A2jsIE14v26r 1j6r4UMIIF0xvEx4A2jsIEc7CjxVAFwI0_Jr0_Gr1l6VACY4xI67k04243AbIYCTnIWIev Ja73UjIFyTuYvjxU2byZUUUUU
X-CM-SenderInfo: h1xd0xxdqjq3hqlr011d1ou0bp/1tbiBAAFDV33BamFvQAAsy
X-DNSRBL:
X-SPAM-SOURCE-CHECK: pass
X-MAIL: gateway2.unionpay.com 40N2q09I014018
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/29pqisHyZNZ4SbMPgYkSt1pRfss>
Subject: Re: [spring] Fwd: IETF WG state changed to WGLC for draft-ietf-spring-srv6-srh-compression
X-BeenThere: spring@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Source Packet Routing in NetworkinG \(SPRING\)" <spring.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spring/>
List-Post: <mailto:spring@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2024 02:52:22 -0000

Dear all,

I think the document is very important and the technical proposal is well written. The proposal is very helpful for the data center network.

I support publication of this document.

Best regards,
HangYuan
 
From: Eduard Metz
Date: 2024-01-22 23:18
To: Weiqiang Cheng
CC: spring
Subject: Re: [spring] Fwd: IETF WG state changed to WGLC for draft-ietf-spring-srv6-srh-compression
I support publication of this document, it has been reviewed thoroughly.  

/Eduard

On Mon, Jan 22, 2024 at 3:45 PM Weiqiang Cheng <chengweiqiang@chinamobile.com> wrote:
Dear all,

I support the publication of the draft.

As highlighted in Chapter 10 of the draft, the solutions proposed have been implemented by over ten leading device and chip vendors, with their commercial products. Additionally, multiple open-source projects have released code aligning with the draft, and several operators around world have initiated commercial deployments.

As a co-author, I believe the draft has been mature enough and ready for publication.


Best regards,

Weiqiang Cheng

 
From: Joel Halpern
Date: 2024-01-22 22:28
To: SPRING WG List
Subject: [spring] Fwd: IETF WG state changed for draft-ietf-spring-srv6-srh-compression
(One of the other chairs pointed out that this had not gone to the list.  So forwarding the announcement.)
This tarts the WG last call on the above document.
Thank you,
Joel


-------- Forwarded Message -------- 
Subject: 
IETF WG state changed for draft-ietf-spring-srv6-srh-compression 
Resent-Date: 
Sun, 21 Jan 2024 11:25:02 -0800 (PST) 
Resent-From: 
alias-bounces@ietf.org 
Resent-To: 
bruno.decraene@orange.com, aretana.ietf@gmail.com, jmh@joelhalpern.com, pengshuping@huawei.com 
Date: 
Sun, 21 Jan 2024 11:25:02 -0800 
From: 
IETF Secretariat <ietf-secretariat-reply@ietf.org> 
To: 
draft-ietf-spring-srv6-srh-compression@ietf.org, spring-chairs@ietf.org 



The IETF WG state of draft-ietf-spring-srv6-srh-compression has been changed
to "In WG Last Call" from "WG Document" by Joel Halpern:

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-spring-srv6-srh-compression/

Comment:
This starts the WG last call for this document. Please comment with support
or opposition, and explanation of your perspective. Silence is not consent,
and just "support" or "oppose" is not helpful. This call will run through
the end of Feb 4, 2024. Yours, Joel Halpern - responsible Spring co-chair

PS: I would appreciate a document shepherd from the WG for the bnext step. Email me if you are willing.

_______________________________________________
spring mailing list
spring@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring