Re: [spring] RFC 7855 on Source Packet Routing in Networking (SPRING) Problem Statement and Requirements

"Stefano Previdi (sprevidi)" <sprevidi@cisco.com> Thu, 26 May 2016 10:03 UTC

Return-Path: <sprevidi@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3750312D932 for <spring@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 26 May 2016 03:03:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -15.947
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.947 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.426, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GapdWQic8flv for <spring@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 26 May 2016 03:03:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-6.cisco.com (alln-iport-6.cisco.com [173.37.142.93]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0C18512D91B for <spring@ietf.org>; Thu, 26 May 2016 03:03:02 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=4542; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1464256981; x=1465466581; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: content-id:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=9ruHw5vgDTRDotnBk5F3yYspGueyEZELBPJ7CbgzAu0=; b=dwlE7PC5iYlV5PNHAmgg8IkQV6rIFRG9K+PJSH0ut2N8KVlkmq4nODi5 j+/3N6wNHPetuILK8a1lDnfvDFuNIo+ljSIQnEWg86eJFf3zH8fR7AL11 sm+J1LaaVyOVlczglF2P1m3mXev1NAT+S+7b6funu9r/W2wdIXW6FS6nF o=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0AvAgBtyUZX/4cNJK1cgzlWfQa5dgENgXgXC4UlSgIcgRU4FAEBAQEBAQFlJ4RDAQEBAwEBAQEgERogEAsCAQgSAgQCAggJDgcCAgIlCgEVAg4CBBMUBwIEiAYIDrE+kUMBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEcgQGFJoF2CIJOgTmCYgUfP4JCK4IuBZg3AYV/iCAKjxKPSwEeAQFCghMlgTVuAYhWCRcffwEBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.26,367,1459814400"; d="scan'208";a="278160831"
Received: from alln-core-2.cisco.com ([173.36.13.135]) by alln-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 26 May 2016 10:02:39 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-009.cisco.com (xch-rtp-009.cisco.com [64.101.220.149]) by alln-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u4QA2d0n001945 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for <spring@ietf.org>; Thu, 26 May 2016 10:02:39 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-010.cisco.com (64.101.220.150) by XCH-RTP-009.cisco.com (64.101.220.149) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1104.5; Thu, 26 May 2016 06:02:38 -0400
Received: from xch-rtp-010.cisco.com ([64.101.220.150]) by XCH-RTP-010.cisco.com ([64.101.220.150]) with mapi id 15.00.1104.009; Thu, 26 May 2016 06:02:38 -0400
From: "Stefano Previdi (sprevidi)" <sprevidi@cisco.com>
To: SPRING WG <spring@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [spring] RFC 7855 on Source Packet Routing in Networking (SPRING) Problem Statement and Requirements
Thread-Index: AQHRtuBgQDomY/3NR0uXgKVISfkIVZ/LQMQA
Date: Thu, 26 May 2016 10:02:38 +0000
Message-ID: <E83F2594-C565-4967-8DBB-9C9359B24644@cisco.com>
References: <20160525234831.943B3180006@rfc-editor.org>
In-Reply-To: <20160525234831.943B3180006@rfc-editor.org>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.61.76.85]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <364385CA2DD011478C94ADC561F0FDC8@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/5FdxYu94yhprnDa01Zn4mfecWvc>
Subject: Re: [spring] RFC 7855 on Source Packet Routing in Networking (SPRING) Problem Statement and Requirements
X-BeenThere: spring@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Stacked Tunnels for Source Routing \(STATUS\)." <spring.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spring/>
List-Post: <mailto:spring@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 May 2016 10:03:04 -0000

SPRING’ers,

This is our first rfc. 

Now that we have a problem statement and requirements documents, we know what we have to do ;-)

Thanks to everyone for the support.


Thanks.
s.


> On May 26, 2016, at 1:48 AM, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org wrote:
> 
> A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.
> 
> 
>        RFC 7855
> 
>        Title:      Source Packet Routing in Networking 
>                    (SPRING) Problem Statement and Requirements 
>        Author:     S. Previdi, Ed.,
>                    C. Filsfils, Ed.,
>                    B. Decraene, S. Litkowski,
>                    M. Horneffer, R. Shakir
>        Status:     Informational
>        Stream:     IETF
>        Date:       May 2016
>        Mailbox:    sprevidi@cisco.com, 
>                    cfilsfil@cisco.com, 
>                    bruno.decraene@orange.com, 
>                    stephane.litkowski@orange.com, 
>                    Martin.Horneffer@telekom.de,
>                    rjs@rob.sh
>        Pages:      19
>        Characters: 38006
>        Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso:   None
> 
>        I-D Tag:    draft-ietf-spring-problem-statement-08.txt
> 
>        URL:        https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7855
> 
>        DOI:        http://dx.doi.org/10.17487/RFC7855
> 
> The ability for a node to specify a forwarding path, other than the
> normal shortest path, that a particular packet will traverse,
> benefits a number of network functions.  Source-based routing
> mechanisms have previously been specified for network protocols but
> have not seen widespread adoption.  In this context, the term
> "source" means "the point at which the explicit route is imposed";
> therefore, it is not limited to the originator of the packet (i.e.,
> the node imposing the explicit route may be the ingress node of an
> operator's network).
> 
> This document outlines various use cases, with their requirements,
> that need to be taken into account by the Source Packet Routing in
> Networking (SPRING) architecture for unicast traffic.  Multicast use
> cases and requirements are out of scope for this document.
> 
> This document is a product of the Source Packet Routing in Networking Working Group of the IETF.
> 
> 
> INFORMATIONAL: This memo provides information for the Internet community.
> It does not specify an Internet standard of any kind. Distribution of
> this memo is unlimited.
> 
> This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists.
> To subscribe or unsubscribe, see
>  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
>  https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist
> 
> For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search
> For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk
> 
> Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the
> author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org.  Unless
> specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for
> unlimited distribution.
> 
> 
> The RFC Editor Team
> Association Management Solutions, LLC
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> spring mailing list
> spring@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring