[spring] Request Review from SPRING on draft-peng-idr-segment-routing-te-policy-attr
liu.yao71@zte.com.cn Mon, 13 May 2024 02:43 UTC
Return-Path: <liu.yao71@zte.com.cn>
X-Original-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B90D8C14F5F3; Sun, 12 May 2024 19:43:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.892
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.892 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OZzVw-J3ts7O; Sun, 12 May 2024 19:43:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mxhk.zte.com.cn (mxhk.zte.com.cn [63.216.63.35]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5A5BAC14F5EA; Sun, 12 May 2024 19:43:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mxct.zte.com.cn (unknown [192.168.251.13]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mxhk.zte.com.cn (FangMail) with ESMTPS id 4Vd3gy5DyQz6G3wm; Mon, 13 May 2024 10:43:10 +0800 (CST)
Received: from mse-fl1.zte.com.cn (unknown [10.5.228.132]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mxct.zte.com.cn (FangMail) with ESMTPS id 4Vd3gL6T3yz501bL; Mon, 13 May 2024 10:42:38 +0800 (CST)
Received: from njb2app05.zte.com.cn ([10.55.22.121]) by mse-fl1.zte.com.cn with SMTP id 44D2gT1Z056458; Mon, 13 May 2024 10:42:29 +0800 (+08) (envelope-from liu.yao71@zte.com.cn)
Received: from mapi (njb2app07[null]) by mapi (Zmail) with MAPI id mid203; Mon, 13 May 2024 10:42:30 +0800 (CST)
Date: Mon, 13 May 2024 10:42:30 +0800
X-Zmail-TransId: 2aff66417e16ffffffffff7-4aab2
X-Mailer: Zmail v1.0
Message-ID: <20240513104230559Rm24rgnqDBQaUhVOhYGmR@zte.com.cn>
Mime-Version: 1.0
From: liu.yao71@zte.com.cn
To: spring@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=====_001_next====="
X-MAIL: mse-fl1.zte.com.cn 44D2gT1Z056458
X-Fangmail-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-Fangmail-MID-QID: 66417E3E.002/4Vd3gy5DyQz6G3wm
Message-ID-Hash: KGASMPWYGC2XB5IO63OGIAHDLSHCBT3Z
X-Message-ID-Hash: KGASMPWYGC2XB5IO63OGIAHDLSHCBT3Z
X-MailFrom: liu.yao71@zte.com.cn
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-spring.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: draft-peng-idr-segment-routing-te-policy-attr@ietf.org, idr-chairs@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Subject: [spring] Request Review from SPRING on draft-peng-idr-segment-routing-te-policy-attr
List-Id: "Source Packet Routing in NetworkinG (SPRING)" <spring.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/6GFGsD9WG71_fIJruWVV8o9ei7o>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spring>
List-Help: <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:spring-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:spring@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:spring-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:spring-leave@ietf.org>
Hi SPRING & Chairs, The WG adoption call for draft-peng-idr-segment-routing-te-policy-attr is under consideration in IDR. Since this document defines new segment types for SR-MPLS adj-SIDs, to get the approval from SPRING is suggested by the IDR chairs. Below is the link of the draft. It defines new Segment Types and proposes extensions for BGP to provide algorithm information for SR-MPLS Adjacency-SIDs when delivering SR Policy via BGP. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-peng-idr-segment-routing-te-policy-attr-09 The authors would like to request review and comments from SPRING experts. And any feedback or suggestions are more than welcome. Thanks, Yao (on behalf of the co-authors)