[spring] Re: Re: C-SIDs and upper layer checksums (draft-ietf-spring-srv6-srh-compression)

Yisong Liu <liuyisong@chinamobile.com> Tue, 09 April 2024 00:42 UTC

Return-Path: <liuyisong@chinamobile.com>
X-Original-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 472DEC151535; Mon, 8 Apr 2024 17:42:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.634
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.634 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FROM_EXCESS_BASE64=0.001, HDRS_MISSP=0.262, HTML_FONT_FACE_BAD=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ed5J8ZPKzP1P; Mon, 8 Apr 2024 17:42:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cmccmta2.chinamobile.com (cmccmta4.chinamobile.com [111.22.67.137]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E5E9C15109E; Mon, 8 Apr 2024 17:42:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-RM-TagInfo: emlType=0
X-RM-SPAM-FLAG: 00000000
Received: from spf.mail.chinamobile.com (unknown[10.188.0.87]) by rmmx-syy-dmz-app08-12008 (RichMail) with SMTP id 2ee866148f029ab-6d9b4; Tue, 09 Apr 2024 08:42:44 +0800 (CST)
X-RM-TRANSID: 2ee866148f029ab-6d9b4
X-RM-TagInfo: emlType=0
X-RM-SPAM-FLAG: 00000000
Received: from CMCC-PC (unknown[10.2.51.34]) by rmsmtp-syy-appsvr03-12003 (RichMail) with SMTP id 2ee366148f04b38-2e7db; Tue, 09 Apr 2024 08:42:44 +0800 (CST)
X-RM-TRANSID: 2ee366148f04b38-2e7db
MIME-Version: 1.0
x-PcFlag: 42a7cd04-7d3b-4610-a1ea-8d93420d54c0_5_153355
X-Mailer: PC_RICHMAIL 2.9.49
Date: Tue, 09 Apr 2024 08:42:44 +0800
From: Yisong Liu <liuyisong@chinamobile.com>
To: Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>, SPRING WG List <spring@ietf.org>
Cc: spring-chairs <spring-chairs@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <202404090842441897668011@chinamobile.com>
Content-Type: multipart/Alternative; boundary="----=_001_NextPart1897668011_=----"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/6skh7MXi7EHuS81JSynRpTQXbWg>
Subject: [spring] Re: Re: C-SIDs and upper layer checksums (draft-ietf-spring-srv6-srh-compression)
X-BeenThere: spring@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Source Packet Routing in NetworkinG \(SPRING\)" <spring.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spring/>
List-Post: <mailto:spring@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Apr 2024 00:42:50 -0000


Hi Alvaro &amp; WG members,




As an operator,  I think there will be no intermediate nodes performing SRv6 packet upper layer checksum in our network deployment. Currently, there is no problem with C-SID deployment. I feel that there is no need to change the text in Section 6.5.




Best Regards

Yisong











 



发件人: Alvaro Retana

时间: 2024/04/03(星期三)01:41

收件人: SPRING WG List;

抄送人: spring-chairs;

主题: Re: [spring] C-SIDs and upper layer checksums (draft-ietf-spring-srv6-srh-compression)      

[Moving this message up on everyone’s mailbox.] 


  

Dear WG: 


  

We have received no replies to this request.  If no changes are needed to §6.5 then that is ok, but if you have a different opinion please speak up. 


  

Thanks! 


  

Alvaro. 
 

On March 28, 2024 at 8:04:30 AM, Alvaro Retana (aretana.ietf@gmail.com) wrote:  

 

 


 Section 6.5 of draft-ietf-spring-srv6-srh-compression describes the behavior when an originating node inside an SRv6 domain creates a packet with a C-SID as the final destination. This description differs from the text in Section 8.1 of RFC8200.   
 
 We plan to send the draft to the 6man WG for review and explicitly highlight this difference.  
 
 Please comment on the text in Section 6.5. Does anything need to be added, deleted, changed, or clarified?  
 
 We want to ask for feedback soon; please send comments on this topic by April 5th. 
 
 Thanks! 
 
 Alvaro. 
 -- for spring-chairs