[spring] spring WG Adoption Call for draft-peng-spring-pmtu-sr-policy
Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 18 June 2024 15:41 UTC
Return-Path: <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CE73C15106E; Tue, 18 Jun 2024 08:41:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.105
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.105 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id s6wBZAuMIj2B; Tue, 18 Jun 2024 08:41:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pg1-x52f.google.com (mail-pg1-x52f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::52f]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A46C4C14F6A8; Tue, 18 Jun 2024 08:41:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pg1-x52f.google.com with SMTP id 41be03b00d2f7-681bc7f50d0so4611654a12.0; Tue, 18 Jun 2024 08:41:35 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1718725294; x=1719330094; darn=ietf.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date :mime-version:from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=XJ527ANQC0fdnaEpNmXkUa4Kw0tybAFrHq0dt35qf/c=; b=PWP4DqECNbXAcIrORNBBrYrsg5tWOhM0QxwjF70wUuj2JF0tY6It8b4Lp6lFQS9L93 qKUSiD4EElqt0L7Lc4u3od7JbHeAEmLH3I533a57TKnBBZ/FhriXlGMDU8gREt1TgrDi 4YiClH+An4KSXZadR5BGsIaytv+d0NbmU61C6Wum1Yb/gAtnXT1Ni+fhd1MnCZgoNOS4 m8IZdfEcxMPpqR5d9g/gfk08/xxlvOS8nvz2lHvO3t3bYy8Kfgzp+rlsCQxLWENJKjkh ntU7YUNY/dTOOqONVQ4z0IU4fBvxJKl1tKmPV1oAtxasq/lN+nTSqjZo2wvRTmuPYtaB 8sCA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1718725294; x=1719330094; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date :mime-version:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=XJ527ANQC0fdnaEpNmXkUa4Kw0tybAFrHq0dt35qf/c=; b=HmSWxdHbb2yaAtU2SZt6456yHW5j0Tgj68lJU73aVJK2285bTcsfNKsUsbAzhyrY9U /XbaaJK3jl90K+MOegTrMzpUKxhG6DkQmUCQGolz1GvVkegvgk0HjeXlNYM+fV5ybORf tSe2loyQ57nixy6hAUC6q2+i+Ls8QmCLOPd6SdIXaBnC3gO5m8xz+OBkLcNBgCzt83Nj L6Pj5KdK+ltR0ZcD2MK3qC1xwjkRiuEdDDn4ECcna40cP8477NH9LkWlmXqu13Lp8nhA 6DkHcUBJXb4m++7yzM1Y9YbPOoGsAkOzljoeznAsWXyTR1TGtHBipPoQtTvFyMtqrcyB Vp4g==
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCXuZaA0hgmrtyDWdF4R0/6diKOjXjSn0BU150FEDTYnRFYg9Tj9/v17Zwue4y6pGhD3sSxwANSsdoPIyH1nrf3Ohr7oXEBc
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YweLkAbz8LyZL+IBmlF06MxptuFKdkL2+ynxFPJBNM/FVChgE5d 3v1KcMpXoqO91GJ/gBNyMVDtxij0i8KrvRXnXpel9CMUWGvFHNy7i/lZaLegfsnWTArFGsfo6PO MJFmoqq0OODBjY0zyL3nIMRtn7esfOe2i
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEMB4OPTyJRyHuu0XTVq+WTSVU8GtxcMYfHhd+I2nj/0lwCUMGsuxbXZoufGwXinmkFR8t3x27SE2kijz8Sewk=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:dacf:b0:1f7:105:97d1 with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-1f98b2132e4mr40681675ad.6.1718725294189; Tue, 18 Jun 2024 08:41:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 1058052472880 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Tue, 18 Jun 2024 10:41:33 -0500
From: Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2024 10:41:33 -0500
Message-ID: <CAMMESsyObenev5KUG2WnSz9yq-ed3gbgPjcGYNcseJ6GHZibpA@mail.gmail.com>
To: SPRING WG <spring@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-ID-Hash: HCPY6NGA4JNHNKLY2SCXFUJQWOW7KL5X
X-Message-ID-Hash: HCPY6NGA4JNHNKLY2SCXFUJQWOW7KL5X
X-MailFrom: aretana.ietf@gmail.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-spring.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: draft-peng-spring-pmtu-sr-policy@ietf.org, spring Chairs <spring-chairs@ietf.org>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Subject: [spring] spring WG Adoption Call for draft-peng-spring-pmtu-sr-policy
List-Id: "Source Packet Routing in NetworkinG (SPRING)" <spring.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/8wWpwPeJI0rtgN6zdfLg0hOED_4>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spring>
List-Help: <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:spring-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:spring@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:spring-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:spring-leave@ietf.org>
Dear WG: This message starts a two-week adoption call for draft-peng-spring-pmtu-sr-policy, ending on July/2nd. From the Abstract: This document defines the Path MTU (PMTU) for Segment Routing (SR) Policy (called SR-PMTU). It applies to both Segment Routing over IPv6 (SRv6) and SR-MPLS. This document specifies the framework of SR-PMTU for SR Policy including the link MTU collection, the SR-PMTU computation, the SR-PMTU enforcement, and the handling behaviours on the headend. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-peng-spring-pmtu-sr-policy/ Please review the draft and consider whether you support its adoption by the WG. Please share any thoughts with the list to indicate support or opposition -- this is not a vote. If you are willing to provide a more in-depth review, please state it explicitly to give the chairs an indication of the energy level in the working group willing to work on the document. WG adoption is the start of the process. The fundamental question is whether you agree the proposal is worth the WG's time to work on and whether this draft represents a good starting point. The chairs are particularly interested in hearing the opinions of people who are not authors of the document. Note that draft-ietf-pce-pcep-pmtu ("Support for Path MTU (PMTU) in the Path Computation Element (PCE) Communication Protocol (PCEP)") Normatively references this document. It may be helpful to look at that document too. Thanks! Alvaro (for the Chairs)
- [spring] spring WG Adoption Call for draft-peng-s… Alvaro Retana
- [spring] Re: spring WG Adoption Call for draft-pe… Pengshuping (Peng Shuping)
- [spring] Re: spring WG Adoption Call for draft-pe… duzongpeng@foxmail.com
- [spring] Re: [警惕!外部邮件]spring WG Adoption Call for… 刘莹(联通集团本部)
- [spring] Re: spring WG Adoption Call for draft-pe… Gyan Mishra
- [spring] Re: spring WG Adoption Call for draft-pe… Greg Mirsky
- [spring] Re: spring WG Adoption Call for draft-pe… Pengshuping (Peng Shuping)
- [spring] Re: spring WG Adoption Call for draft-pe… Alvaro Retana
- [spring] Re: spring WG Adoption Call for draft-pe… Pengshuping (Peng Shuping)
- [spring] Re: spring WG Adoption Call for draft-pe… linchangwang