IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [spring] use case vs requirements

Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net> Fri, 04 April 2014 19:16 UTC

Return-Path: <rraszuk@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC2C11A022B for <spring@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Apr 2014 12:16:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.277
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.277 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OEY2enR1K1MI for <spring@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Apr 2014 12:16:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ig0-x235.google.com (mail-ig0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::235]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8F3B1A0192 for <spring@ietf.org>; Fri, 4 Apr 2014 12:16:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ig0-f181.google.com with SMTP id h18so1337893igc.14 for <spring@ietf.org>; Fri, 04 Apr 2014 12:16:17 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=PkrZMolL3ITXHrWRoy07qnTMVUH7FcmSCvejzQgBKQU=; b=SJ3R+lDpfKT72iuFEARArRxuLLX4IOkwjCV9G8NisU1B3MmleGtsYTpG9PjePzTt+i j3XwI+7vK9+J2ICGAGu2XJFSjiJ9woZNq3XEO5SN/yWu7mrVDQCX4midsTOMfw/Cuh4u 7hWAkZkxTTSSCn/mAfNprjT9vU3LUldEGaqV6STlEEwNo9mB7Ouwlj9ct84aAv0vfma5 b45BMR7QJHPe81CRAJsmsNGh97Vijl6wy7EXvEcFcRC7L2OlI/0lljYkLM2JER2ZMPZu k1wmawimGzx1B6lpwP9gBqGiM1x45Qq2l7XeRqfWTN8I5ElkilN2Q528fLF1mB4rD0U6 bsNw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.50.109.230 with SMTP id hv6mr5127515igb.9.1396638977138; Fri, 04 Apr 2014 12:16:17 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: rraszuk@gmail.com
Received: by 10.64.242.198 with HTTP; Fri, 4 Apr 2014 12:16:16 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <201404041854.s34IsoV78171@magenta.juniper.net>
References: <201404041854.s34IsoV78171@magenta.juniper.net>
Date: Fri, 04 Apr 2014 21:16:16 +0200
X-Google-Sender-Auth: xLAaFjaS1nk2T7hsR1buc1Ma1Iw
Message-ID: <CA+b+ERmPv25a27+ZjDUcHNfKaUxTDApBzROgzHijb5kT5ms-Bg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
To: Yakov Rekhter <yakov@juniper.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="089e013a1d8e1ca8d904f63c5a33"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/9iEy90bn7vPTc7SuvtYzasEgkXM
Cc: "Alvaro Retana (aretana)" <aretana@cisco.com>, "spring@ietf.org" <spring@ietf.org>, "John G. Scudder" <jgs@juniper.net>
Subject: Re: [spring] use case vs requirements
X-BeenThere: spring@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Stacked Tunnels for Source Routing \(STATUS\)." <spring.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/spring/>
List-Post: <mailto:spring@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Apr 2014 19:16:25 -0000

Hi Yakov,

As a WG member not a chair I would like to ask for your clarification.

Let's take some other IETF's WG use case document namely LISP Traffic
Engineering Use Cases document:

https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-farinacci-lisp-te-06

It covers LISP TE Use Cases using natural language of LISP architecture.

Likewise SPRING use cases documents should describe use cases using SPRING
architecture not be completely detached from SPRING WG charter and focus.

Otherwise they may belong at best in RTGWG not in SPRING WG.

Regards,
R.



On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 8:54 PM, Yakov Rekhter <yakov@juniper.net> wrote:

> Alvaro and John,
>
> The SPRING WG charter asks for "One or more documents describing
> SPRING use cases".
>
> Give that, could you, as the SPRING WG co-chairs, comment on whether
> the SPRING use cases document(s) should cover just the use cases, or
> should also include the SPRING architecture requirements.
>
> Yakov.
>
> _______________________________________________
> spring mailing list
> spring@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email