IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [spring] AD Review of draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-12

"Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)" <ginsberg@cisco.com> Thu, 30 November 2017 22:10 UTC

Return-Path: <ginsberg@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FEDE126E64; Thu, 30 Nov 2017 14:10:16 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.519
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.519 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id THFRSUZAdNTo; Thu, 30 Nov 2017 14:10:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alln-iport-5.cisco.com (alln-iport-5.cisco.com [173.37.142.92]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7F96A1200CF; Thu, 30 Nov 2017 14:10:14 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=13190; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1512079814; x=1513289414; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=79sdttIs1WAdUyKUP7Nq4GiWhlUYrsKcvulaTwc+XH4=; b=B4fmtYNTMOmhAXTAP0OBZGEK1e5TNGsVvjM/EgWleZ+szi+PUAj+03FD uQQrOvOCiV8W8fiNklUUm4+/x2UBtPKencDb+IaqKfN/Pex3O82yEHM/2 nj4Le2iZN0YUJnHvPS9JgzNfcV/Ri1V42Q36slRY+CLKS7KHX+fyB10M6 Q=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0AZAgCBgCBa/5RdJa1aGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQcBAQEBAYJKcmZuJweDeJkTgX2Ia4hAhUuCEQqFOwIahQdAFwEBAQEBAQEBAWsohR8BAQEEIwpMEAIBCA4DAQMBASgDAgICHxEUAwYIAgQKBAUIiTZMAxWmIoInhzQNgyQBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEdg0GCCYFWhRSCa4Jrgl+CYwWZMYhtPQKQFYRxk1yNN4hhAhEZAYE5ASEBNoFRbxWCY4RVeIhwgRQBAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="5.45,343,1508803200"; d="scan'208,217"; a="38110308"
Received: from rcdn-core-12.cisco.com ([173.37.93.148]) by alln-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 30 Nov 2017 22:10:13 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-002.cisco.com (xch-aln-002.cisco.com [173.36.7.12]) by rcdn-core-12.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id vAUMAD4n000525 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 30 Nov 2017 22:10:13 GMT
Received: from xch-aln-001.cisco.com (173.36.7.11) by XCH-ALN-002.cisco.com (173.36.7.12) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1320.4; Thu, 30 Nov 2017 16:10:13 -0600
Received: from xch-aln-001.cisco.com ([173.36.7.11]) by XCH-ALN-001.cisco.com ([173.36.7.11]) with mapi id 15.00.1320.000; Thu, 30 Nov 2017 16:10:12 -0600
From: "Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)" <ginsberg@cisco.com>
To: Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
CC: "draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing@ietf.org>, "spring-chairs@ietf.org" <spring-chairs@ietf.org>, "spring@ietf.org" <spring@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: AD Review of draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-12
Thread-Index: AQHTU0tQWrXlBDYX+EOldCp6p/QpkKMuDGIA//+cZNA=
Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2017 22:10:12 +0000
Message-ID: <e213ea82255d4482811d4c51aa648494@XCH-ALN-001.cisco.com>
References: <CAMMESszQPXizLdZoovAsnnMMnYDpBjRd7dEEokngBWLco_hJCw@mail.gmail.com> <CAMMESsxkYFwGOiFYBjqKbsFQQ9RMsr2exAsmsbkp0krf0+SK7w@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAMMESsxkYFwGOiFYBjqKbsFQQ9RMsr2exAsmsbkp0krf0+SK7w@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.154.161.149]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_e213ea82255d4482811d4c51aa648494XCHALN001ciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/C_lUGpmPEVgkfWPMl9RaVjxj8nM>
Subject: Re: [spring] AD Review of draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-12
X-BeenThere: spring@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Stacked Tunnels for Source Routing \(STATUS\)." <spring.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spring/>
List-Post: <mailto:spring@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2017 22:10:17 -0000

Alvaro –

Sorry, I was waiting for a new rev of the draft addressing the second round of comments to be ready to publish. That is in progress – Ahmed and I are still working to resolve some overlap between architecture document and sr mpls document – but we hope to have new versions soon.

In the meantime, I am not aware of any undisclosed IPR.

    Les


From: Alvaro Retana [mailto:aretana.ietf@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2017 2:05 PM
To: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) <ginsberg@cisco.com>
Cc: draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing@ietf.org; spring-chairs@ietf.org; spring@ietf.org
Subject: RE: AD Review of draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-12

Les:

Hi!

I don’t think I got a reply on the IPR question below.

Thanks!

Alvaro.


On November 1, 2017 at 3:55:00 PM, Alvaro Retana (aretana.ietf@gmail.com<mailto:aretana.ietf@gmail.com>) wrote:

Les:

Hi!
Apologies for the long delay in responding. The transference of the pen from Stefano resulted in a longer delay than it should have.

Thanks for taking this on!

As a new author: are you aware of any undeclared IPR for this document?

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email