[spring] Fw:New Version Notification for draft-lm-mpls-sfc-path-verification-00.txt

liu.yao71@zte.com.cn Tue, 14 July 2020 09:19 UTC

Return-Path: <liu.yao71@zte.com.cn>
X-Original-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 982ED3A0766; Tue, 14 Jul 2020 02:19:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.917
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.917 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ozRQ_cOqhok0; Tue, 14 Jul 2020 02:19:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mxhk.zte.com.cn (mxhk.zte.com.cn []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5A89C3A0764; Tue, 14 Jul 2020 02:19:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mxct.zte.com.cn (unknown []) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTPS id 6AB33D2481A47157FDFB; Tue, 14 Jul 2020 17:19:04 +0800 (CST)
Received: from mse-fl2.zte.com.cn (unknown []) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTPS id 5A3667C944FD1C56039C; Tue, 14 Jul 2020 17:19:04 +0800 (CST)
Received: from njxapp04.zte.com.cn ([]) by mse-fl2.zte.com.cn with SMTP id 06E9J2O1065818; Tue, 14 Jul 2020 17:19:02 +0800 (GMT-8) (envelope-from liu.yao71@zte.com.cn)
Received: from mapi (njxapp05[null]) by mapi (Zmail) with MAPI id mid203; Tue, 14 Jul 2020 17:19:02 +0800 (CST)
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2020 17:19:02 +0800 (CST)
X-Zmail-TransId: 2afd5f0d7886a6f4cfa5
X-Mailer: Zmail v1.0
Message-ID: <202007141719027100313@zte.com.cn>
References: 159460295241.22211.12379706801988580614@ietfa.amsl.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
From: <liu.yao71@zte.com.cn>
To: <mpls@ietf.org>, <spring@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=====_001_next====="
X-MAIL: mse-fl2.zte.com.cn 06E9J2O1065818
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/ENVtHtGtYEXuscJiiZuNGvynuK4>
Subject: [spring] =?utf-8?q?Fw=3ANew_Version_Notification_for_draft-lm-mp?= =?utf-8?q?ls-sfc-path-verification-00=2Etxt?=
X-BeenThere: spring@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Source Packet Routing in NetworkinG \(SPRING\)" <spring.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spring/>
List-Post: <mailto:spring@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2020 09:19:10 -0000

Dear All,

We have posted a new draft describing extensions to MPLS LSP ping to support verification between the control plane and the data plane state for MPLS-based SFC (including SR-MPLS service programming and MPLS-based NSH).

Comments, suggestions and questions are more than welcome.




发件人:internet-drafts@ietf.org <internet-drafts@ietf.org>
收件人:刘尧00165286;Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com>om>;
日 期 :2020年07月13日 09:15
主 题 :New Version Notification for draft-lm-mpls-sfc-path-verification-00.txt

A new version of I-D, draft-lm-mpls-sfc-path-verification-00.txt
has been successfully submitted by Liu Yao and posted to the
IETF repository.

Name:        draft-lm-mpls-sfc-path-verification
Revision:    00
Title:        MPLS-based Service Function Path(SFP) Consistency Verification
Document date:    2020-07-12
Group:        Individual Submission
Pages:        9
URL:            https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-lm-mpls-sfc-path-verification-00.txt
Status:         https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-lm-mpls-sfc-path-verification/
Htmlized:       https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-lm-mpls-sfc-path-verification-00
Htmlized:       https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-lm-mpls-sfc-path-verification

   This document proposes a method to verify the correlation between
   Service Function Chaining control and/or management plane view of the
   specified Service Function Path and the state of its data.  It works
   for both SR service programming and MPLS-based NSH SFC.


Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.

The IETF Secretariat